Every ad the free audit funnel needs, beat by beat. Two libraries: the direct response ads that acquire the application, and the Hammer Them library that runs in the 72 hours between someone booking and taking the call. Spoken lines in big type so you can read them off the screen, stage directions underneath, and a tick per take that remembers where you got to in this browser.
The VSL itself is not on this page. It is a different shoot with a different setup, and it lives at /call-vsl and /call-confirmation-vsl.
Jeremy has a different SOP for each stage, and they are not alternatives, they run at the same time on different audiences. The two on this page are the two we can film in one session.
The strongest angle we have, because it is checkable in ten seconds and the answer is usually bad. Envy beats fear here: an abstract threat is easy to defer, a specific rival being recommended is not.
PainThere's a business in your market that AI keeps recommending. Statistically, it isn't you.
QuestionAsk ChatGPT to recommend a company that does what you do. Whose name comes up?
Bold claimI'll tell you for free exactly which competitor the AI engines are naming instead of you.
There's a business in your market that AI keeps recommending. It probably isn't you.
Harry to camera, tight crop, flat
When a buyer asks ChatGPT who to use, it names two or three companies. Not ten links. Two or three. And you have no way of seeing whether you're one of them.
slight lean in
So we'll show you, free. We pull the actual AI answers for your category, grade your site against the framework we use for QuickBooks and Weber, and hand you the three moves that close the gap.
over-shoulder: citation check on screen
Thirty minutes, and the plan is yours either way. Apply below.
back to camera, point down at CTA
Ask ChatGPT to recommend a company that does what you do. Go on. Whose name comes up?
Harry to camera, cold open, no music
Because it will name someone. Two or three businesses, confidently, like a friend would. And whoever gets named is taking meetings you never even heard about.
hold eye contact, let it sit
I know how much this matters because it happened to us in reverse. Samsung found my agency through a ChatGPT recommendation. No ad, no referral. A machine vouched for us and they called.
b-roll: ChatGPT answer on screen
So here's the offer. We'll pull the AI citations for your category free, grade your site against the six-part framework my team uses for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, and show you the three moves that close the biggest gap first.
screen share: scorecard being filled in
Why free? Because some of the businesses we audit end up wanting us to run the plan. That's the whole mechanic. If it makes more sense for you to run it yourself, we'll say so on the call.
back to camera, plain and unhurried
Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team, and you keep the plan whether you hire us or not. Businesses doing a million or more, apply below. Sixty seconds.
point at CTA, hold, cut to end card
Headlines
Primary text
Straight from the CPO problem line: they have no measurement, so they cannot tell working from being replaced. This angle sells the measurement itself, which is the honest core of the offer.
PainYou can measure every channel in your business except the one that's replacing them.
QuestionWhat do the AI engines say about your business? Genuine question. Do you actually know?
Bold claimYour analytics cannot see the conversation that decides who your buyers call.
You can measure every channel in your business except the one that's quietly replacing them.
Harry to camera, plain background, deadpan
You know your cost per lead. You know your rankings. You have no idea what ChatGPT says when a buyer asks who to use in your category.
counting on fingers, then a shrug
We'll measure it for you. Free. Where the engines cite your competitors, how your site scores against our six-part framework, and the three moves that close the gap.
over-shoulder: scorecard on screen
Thirty minutes, plan's yours either way. Apply below.
to camera, point down
What do the AI engines say about your business? Genuine question. Do you actually know?
Harry to camera, tight frame, a real question not a rhetorical one
Most owners can't answer it, and that's the whole problem. Not that you're behind, but that you have no instrument. You can't tell the difference between your SEO working and your SEO being replaced.
steady, unhurried
And by the time it shows up as a traffic drop in a monthly report, it's already happened. The report is a trailing indicator of a decision made months earlier.
slow, let the point land
So we built the instrument. We pull where the answer engines cite your competitors instead of you, grade your site against the six-part framework my team runs for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, and give you the three moves in priority order.
screen share of the grading sheet
It costs nothing, because some of the businesses we audit want us to run the plan. That's how the agency grows. If you're better off running it yourself, we'll tell you that on the call.
back to camera, matter of fact
Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team. Businesses doing a million or more, apply below. It takes about a minute.
point at CTA, cut
Headlines
Primary text
Aimed at the biggest real segment: they already have an agency. Deliberately not a pitch to fire anyone, which is the trap. A free second opinion is an easy yes and it is also the honest description of what the call is.
PainYou've been getting an SEO report every month. Can you name one thing it changed?
Objection-firstI'm not going to tell you to fire your SEO agency. I'm going to give you a way to check on them.
QuestionIf your agency is doing a good job, a second opinion costs you nothing. So why not have one?
I'm not going to tell you to fire your SEO agency. I'm going to give you a way to check on them.
Harry to camera, half smile, dry
Because you can't really judge the work, can you. That's the expertise you hired them for. So you read the monthly report and hope.
shrug, no judgment in the delivery
We'll give you an independent read, free. Your score against the framework we use for QuickBooks and Weber, and where AI is naming competitors instead of you. Take it straight to your agency.
over-shoulder: scorecard
Thirty minutes, no switching. Apply below.
to camera, point down
You've been getting an SEO report every month. Can you name one thing it actually changed?
Harry to camera, plain, genuinely asking
If you can, brilliant, your agency is doing its job and this will confirm it. If you can't, that's worth thirty minutes of your time to find out about.
even-handed, not smug
And there's a specific reason to check right now. AI search is the part most agencies haven't caught up on. Answer engines recommend two or three businesses per query, and getting cited works differently to ranking.
b-roll: AI answer naming businesses
So we'll give you an independent read for free. Your score against the six-part framework we use for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, where AI cites competitors instead of you, and the three moves that matter most.
screen share of the grading sheet
You can hand every bit of it to your current agency that same afternoon. No switching, no lock-in, and I mean that. If you'd rather we ran it, we'll talk. If not, you're still ahead.
open hands, back to camera
Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team. Businesses doing a million or more, apply below.
point at CTA, cut to end card
Headlines
Primary text
Our single strongest proof asset, and it does double duty: it establishes credibility and it demonstrates that the mechanism we are selling actually produces clients. Carry it into the call funnel intact.
Bold claimSamsung found my agency through a ChatGPT recommendation. Not an ad. Not a referral.
QuestionWhat would it be worth if the biggest company in your category called you first, having never seen an ad?
PainThe best lead I got last year cost me nothing, and most business owners have no route to one.
Samsung found my agency through ChatGPT. Not an ad. Not a referral. An AI recommended us and they called.
Harry to camera, flat, pause after ChatGPT
That's the position you actually want. Not chasing clients. Being the name that comes up when someone asks.
lean in slightly
So we'll check whether it can happen in your category. Free. Your score against our six-part framework, your citation gap, and the three moves that close it.
over-shoulder: citation check
Thirty minutes, plan's yours either way. Apply below.
point down at CTA
One of the biggest companies in the world found my agency without ever seeing an ad. They just asked ChatGPT.
Harry to camera, cold open, no music
It was Samsung. They wanted an SEO partner, they asked, and it recommended StudioHawk. They arrived already convinced, because a machine they trust vouched for us.
Samsung as plain on-screen text, small dry smile
And that's not luck. It happens because of how a site is built, what it publishes, and whether the engines can read and trust it. It's a method, and it's the one my team runs for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.
slower on it's a method
So here's what I'll do. We'll grade your site against that same six-part framework, free, pull where the engines cite competitors instead of you, and give you the three moves that close the biggest gap first.
screen share: scorecard filling in
Why would we do that for nothing? Because a fair number of the businesses we audit ask us to run the plan. That's the mechanic, and there isn't a catch under it.
back to camera, straight
Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team, and you keep the plan whether you hire us or not. Businesses past a million, apply below.
point at CTA, hold eye contact, cut
Headlines
Primary text
The literal circumstances line from the CPO spine, said back to them in their own words. Highest intent for the in-market 3 to 4 percent, because it describes a problem they are actively carrying rather than one we have to introduce.
PainYour traffic went flat about a year ago and nobody has given you a straight answer about why.
Bold claimIf your organic traffic plateaued and your rankings didn't, I can probably tell you what happened.
QuestionRankings holding, traffic falling. Has anyone actually explained that to you?
Your traffic went flat about a year ago and nobody has given you a straight answer about why.
Harry to camera, tight crop, plain
Here's the usual answer. Your rankings are fine. The click just isn't happening, because the engine answers the question and names two or three businesses instead.
b-roll: AI answer resolving a query
We'll find out whether that's what's happening to you. Free. Where AI names competitors instead of you, your score against our framework, the three moves that fix it.
over-shoulder: scorecard
Thirty minutes. Apply below.
to camera, point down
Rankings holding, traffic falling. Has anyone actually explained that to you?
Harry to camera, genuine question
Because it's the most common thing I hear from established businesses right now. The report says everything is fine. The numbers say otherwise. And the two never get reconciled.
steady, slightly wry
Usually the answer is this. Your ranking is intact, but the click is being resolved before it gets to you. The engine answers the question on the page and recommends two or three businesses. If you're not one of them, that ranking is worth a fraction of what it was.
b-roll: AI overview answering, then a plain results page for contrast
So we'll diagnose it for you, free. Where the engines cite competitors instead of you, how your site scores against the six-part framework we run for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, and the three moves in priority order.
screen share of the grading sheet
No charge, because some of the businesses we audit want us to run the plan. If yours is a job you can do in-house, we'll tell you that instead.
back to camera, unhurried
Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team, and the plan is yours either way. Businesses past a million, apply below.
point at CTA, cut
Headlines
Primary text
Mechanism-forward. Some buyers are moved by a threat and some by an instrument, and this one sells the artifact: a score, a gap, a ranked list. Deliberately the least emotional angle in the set so the pack does not become one note.
QuestionSix things decide whether AI recommends your business. How many of them is your site doing?
Bold claimWe can score your website on AI search readiness out of six, and tell you which one to fix first.
Objection-firstYou don't need another audit PDF. You need a score, a gap and a ranked list of three things.
Six things decide whether AI recommends your business. How many of them is your site actually doing?
Harry to camera, straight question
Most owners don't know, because nobody's ever scored it. And a sixty-page audit isn't a score, it's homework.
dry on homework
So we'll score you out of six, free, show you where AI names competitors instead of you, and tell you which one to fix first.
over-shoulder: six-signal scorecard filling in
Thirty minutes, scorecard's yours. Apply below.
point down at CTA
You don't need another audit PDF. You need a score, a gap, and three things to do about it.
Harry to camera, plain background
Every big audit I've ever seen a business receive had the same flaw. Comprehensive. Four hundred issues, no opinion about which one matters, so nothing happens.
slight shrug, been-there delivery
So we do it the other way. Six signals that decide whether the answer engines can read you, trust you and recommend you. You get a score on each, and the live citations showing who's being named instead of you.
screen share: scorecard, then a citation list
Then the useful part. We tell you which single thing to fix first, and why that one. It's the same framework my team runs for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.
back to camera
It's free because some of the businesses we score end up wanting us to do the work. If yours is something your own team can handle, we'll say so, and you'll still have the scorecard.
open, unhurried
Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team. Businesses past a million, apply below. Sixty seconds.
point at CTA, cut to end card
Headlines
Primary text
SOP-26 lists objection-first as a hook style in its own right, and for a free high-value offer it is the objection. Leading with it converts the suspicious reader instead of losing them silently, and it is the most honest ad in the pack.
Objection-firstWhy would an SEO agency audit your site for free? Let me just tell you.
Bold claimThere's no catch, and I'll explain the business model in about ten seconds.
QuestionWhat's the catch on a free audit from an agency that runs search for QuickBooks and Weber?
Why would an SEO agency audit your site for free? Let me just tell you.
Harry to camera, direct, no preamble
Because a fair number of the businesses we audit end up asking us to run the plan. That's the whole model. No catch under it.
open hands, plain delivery
You get a score against six signals, the citations showing who AI names instead of you, and three moves. Thirty minutes. Yours whether you hire us or not.
over-shoulder: scorecard
Businesses past a million. Apply below.
point down at CTA
If you saw free audit from an SEO agency and thought what's the catch, good. That instinct has served you well.
Harry to camera, half smile
So I'll just answer it. It's free because a fair number of the businesses we audit end up asking us to run the plan afterwards. That's how the agency grows. That's the whole model.
matter of fact, no defensiveness
What you actually get: a score against six signals that decide whether the answer engines recommend you, the live citations showing which competitors get named instead of you, and the three moves that close the biggest gap first.
screen share: scorecard, citation list
And what you won't get: a countdown timer, a fake deadline, or a pitch if a pitch doesn't fit. If what you need is something your own team can handle, we'll say so on the call and you'll still walk away with the plan.
back to camera, steady
I'm Harry Sanders. I founded StudioHawk, we run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, best large SEO agency seven times, 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews.
b-roll: office, awards, quick and unfussy
We put senior people on these calls, which is the only reason there's an application. Sixty seconds, eight questions. Businesses past a million, apply below.
point at CTA, hold, cut
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: There is a measurable, reachable upside at this business size. AI recommendation is not weather, it is a number, and Sylvane, an ordinary Atlanta retailer, moved theirs 621 percent on purpose. The reason to buy is the size of the available gain, not the size of the threat.
Stat OpenAn Atlanta retailer grew their brand mentions inside AI models by 621 percent. They are not a household name. That is the whole point.
Specific QuestionIf the number of times AI names your brand could go up 621 percent, would you want to know what it is today?
Objection-FirstYou are probably waiting to see how AI search settles. Sylvane did not wait. Their brand mentions inside AI models are up 621 percent.
There is a retailer in Atlanta called Sylvane. You have probably not heard of them.
Cold open. Harry to camera, mid shot, office studio. Flat delivery, no smile, no windup. No overlay at all on this beat.
Their brand mentions inside AI models are up 621 percent.
Cut to punch-in at 125%. Overlay stamps 621% large and central on the number, then drops. Hold one beat of silence after.
That is not the models deciding they like them. Somebody worked on it on purpose.
Back to mid shot. Small shrug on the second sentence. Matter of fact, like he is correcting a misunderstanding, not selling.
Which means it is a number. And a number you can see is a number you can move.
Slow push in. B-roll insert for 2 seconds: dark background, a simple counter graphic ticking upward beside one brand name. Cyan accent, no stock footage, no faces.
So, a free thirty minute call. We grade your site, show you where AI is naming a competitor, and give you the three moves that matter.
Back to Harry, direct eye contact held through the whole line. Hands resting, counting nothing. Overlays flash three short beats: SCORE, GAP, THREE MOVES.
Yours to keep either way. Apply below.
Hold the look, no smile until the last half second. Hard cut to end card, apply URL and StudioHawk logo. No music sting, let it end dry.
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: Position economics for the operator who gets in before a channel gets expensive. The buyer's identity is built on having been early to every channel that ever paid off, and the only honest urgency is that citation position compounds, so buying it back off a competitor later costs more than winning it now.
Bold ClaimEvery channel that ever made you money, you were early to. This one is still early.
Specific QuestionIn three years, when someone at your company asks who called AI search first, do you want that answer to be you?
Objection-FirstYou do not have to believe AI replaces Google. You only have to believe that being the brand it names is cheaper to win now than to buy back off someone later.
Think about the channel that made you the most money. You were early to it.
Harry seated, office studio, leaning slightly forward. Conversational, like he is picking up a conversation already in progress. No overlay on the open.
Not because you were clever. Because you got in before the position got expensive.
Small dry half smile on 'not because you were clever'. Cut to a tighter frame on the second half. This line earns the trust, do not rush it.
AI search is at that point now. The engines are working out who they name in your category.
B-roll insert, 3 seconds: dark screen, a question typed, an answer resolving with one brand name inside it. Cyan accent. Editorial, not flashy.
Once a competitor is the one being cited, you are not catching up. You are buying it back.
Back to Harry, direct to camera, delivery slows here. This is the whole argument. Hold on his face, no cut, let half a second of silence sit after it.
So find out where you stand. Thirty minutes with someone senior here, your site graded against SOURC-E.
Push in to 150%. Overlay: FREE 30 MINUTE CALL. Then a second overlay: YOUR SCORE OUT OF SIX.
Apply below. Eight questions.
Flat close, no upsell energy. Hard cut to end card with apply URL. Music drops out entirely on the final line.
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: Professional standing in the accountability moment. Somebody senior is going to ask this person where the business stands on AI search, and they want to answer with a number and a ranked list instead of admitting they do not know. The purchase buys their credibility in that room.
Pain/ProblemSomebody is going to ask you where you stand on AI search. Probably this quarter. What is the answer?
Story OpenThe bad version of that meeting is the one where you say you are keeping an eye on it, and everyone quietly decides you do not know.
Specific QuestionWhen your board asks about AI search, do you want to give them an opinion or a number?
At some point your boss or your board is going to ask where you stand on AI search.
Open on Harry mid frame, standing, office studio, arms relaxed. He states it like a fact of life, not a threat. No overlay, no music yet.
And 'we are keeping an eye on it' sounds exactly like it sounds.
Dry beat. Slight tilt of the head. Cut on the line. Overlay in small type only: WE ARE KEEPING AN EYE ON IT, then it deletes itself character by character.
You do not need a strategy for that meeting. You need a number and a short list.
Music enters low here. Push in to medium close. Hands come up, two fingers, marking the two things. Slow, not animated.
So before we speak we grade your site, and pull where AI is naming a competitor instead of you.
B-roll insert, 3 seconds: clean scorecard graphic on dark background, a score resolving with three ranked rows underneath. Sparse, editorial, cyan accent only.
Then thirty minutes with someone senior here, and you walk out with the score and the three moves.
Back to Harry, direct camera, steady. Overlay: 30 MINUTES. SENIOR TEAM. Then clears.
It is yours either way. Apply below.
Flat, unhurried. Hard cut to end card, apply URL and logo. No smile here, the ad works better if he never sells it.
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: Who is doing the grading. Before you let anyone assess your search, you can verify them in public: 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews, named best large SEO agency seven times, and QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh on the client list. The audit is only worth as much as the people reading it.
Stat Open272 Google reviews. 4.9 stars. Go and read them before you talk to us, that is fine by me.
Specific QuestionWould you let an agency you had never heard of grade your search? Neither would I. So here is the receipt first.
Objection-FirstAnyone can offer you a free audit. The only question worth asking is who is doing the grading.
Before you take a free audit from anybody, including us, go and check them.
Harry to camera, seated, office studio. Says it like advice, not a pitch. Hands still. No overlay for the first three seconds.
Ours is all public. Four point nine stars, two hundred and seventy two Google reviews.
Cut to punch-in. Overlay stamps 4.9 and 272 REVIEWS as two separate hits, one per number. Sharp SFX on each stamp, nothing cartoonish.
Best large SEO agency, seven times. A hundred and twenty specialists in Melbourne, London and Atlanta.
B-roll insert, 3 seconds: three city names appearing on a dark map graphic with cyan markers. Plain and editorial. Cut back on the last word.
We run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.
Back to Harry, direct camera. Client names appear as clean text only, no logos unless cleared for use. He undersells it deliberately.
Then take the call. Thirty minutes, someone senior, and where the engines are naming a competitor instead of you.
Slow push in to 150%. Overlays flash: YOUR SCORE, CITATION GAP, THREE MOVES.
You keep the plan either way. Apply below.
Hold the look one beat past comfortable, then hard cut to end card with apply URL. Music out before the final sentence.
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: REPLACEMENT for the previous fifth angle. The buying journey now produces a shortlist before anyone contacts you, so the loss never appears in your pipeline as a lost deal. Owners misdiagnose the symptom as a sales problem or a soft market when it is a citation problem happening upstream of the pipeline. No existing angle touches the sales and pipeline misdiagnosis.
Pain/ProblemThe deals you never hear about are not lost in sales. They are lost before anyone types your name.
Story OpenSomebody in your category asked a machine who to use this morning. It gave them three names. You were on that list or you were not, and nobody tells you which.
Objection-FirstYou cannot lose a deal you were never shortlisted for. That is exactly what makes this expensive, and why it never shows up in your numbers as a loss.
This morning, someone in your category asked a machine who they should use.
Harry to camera, seated, office studio. Quiet open, almost conversational. No overlay, no music for the first beat.
It gave them three names. You were one of them, or you were not.
Cut to tighter frame. B-roll insert for 2 seconds: dark screen, an answer resolving with three brand names, one dimmed. No faces, no stock footage.
Nobody tells you which. It never shows up as a lost deal, because you never got to the deal.
Back to Harry. Delivery flat and unhurried, he is stating a mechanic, not warning anyone. Let the second sentence land with no cut.
It shows up as a quiet quarter, and everyone blames the market.
Slow push in. Overlay in small type: NOT A SALES PROBLEM. Holds two seconds, then clears.
Free thirty minute call. We grade your site and show you where the engines name a competitor instead of you.
Direct to camera, eye contact held to the end. Overlays flash: YOUR SCORE, CITATION GAP, THREE MOVES.
Yours to keep either way. Apply below.
Dry close, half a beat of silence, then hard cut to end card with apply URL and logo. Music out before the last line.
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: The reason to take the call is whose judgment you get for 30 minutes. The team that runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh reads your business and tells you what it sees, so the value is the caliber of the read, not the document at the end of it.
Verbal hook, bold statementThe team that runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh will spend thirty minutes on your site. You do not pay for it.
Text hook, intriguing questionBefore you take any free audit, ask one question: who is actually going to look?
Visual hook, pre-loaded object openHarry drops a stack of printed site audits onto the desk as the frame opens, already reaching for the top one. He pulls it off the pile, turns it toward the lens, and it stays there while he talks.
Before you take any free audit, ask who is actually going to look at it.
Harry drops a stack of printed audits onto the desk as the frame opens, hand already moving to the top one. Motion in frame one. Text hook: WHO IS ACTUALLY LOOKING.
Normally? A tool nobody supervised, and a kid reading it back to you.
He slides the top report toward the lens, then lets it drop flat. Dry delivery, no smile. Punch in slightly on the discarded page.
With this one you get someone senior from the team that runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.
Cut to static medium on Harry, hands still. Lower third card holds the three client names for the full line so they can be read.
Best large SEO agency seven times. Four point nine stars, two hundred and seventy two reviews.
Cut to a clean stat card, one figure per beat, stair stepping in. No music swell, keep the bed flat under him.
Thirty minutes. We grade you on six things and show you who the engines name instead.
Cut to scorecard graphic, six criteria, score revealed, then the citation list. Blur any real client identifier.
It costs nothing and you keep the plan. Apply below, eight questions.
Medium on Harry, direct to lens, hands still. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, 8 QUESTIONS, 60 SECONDS. Hard cut on the last word, no black tail.
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: Nobody has ever explained the mechanic that decides which company an answer engine names, so the buyer has no way to judge whether AI search is a real discipline with levers he can pull or an old SEO retainer with new words on the invoice.
Verbal hook, bold statementRanking first and getting recommended are two different mechanics. You have only ever been sold the first one.
Text hook, intriguing questionDo you actually know how an AI decides which company to name?
Visual hook, hands busy talkerHarry at a glass wall drawing two columns, marker already moving in frame one. He fills the first column completely, taps the second, and it stays empty for the rest of the ad.
Ranking first and getting recommended are two different jobs.
Tight on Harry at a glass wall, marker already drawing column one as the frame opens. Text hook: TWO DIFFERENT MECHANICS.
This one you have been paying for. This one nobody has explained.
Harry taps column one, then the empty column two. Hands busy on the glass throughout. Punch in on the blank column.
It does not rank you. It builds an answer out of how you get described.
Whip transition to motion graphic. Several source cards fly in and collapse into one answer block.
If those descriptions do not agree, or are not there, you do not get named.
Back to Harry, static medium, arms down, unhurried. Let the line land. One beat of silence before the cut.
So we grade you on six things, free, and show you which ones are missing.
Scorecard graphic, six criteria, two marked short. Stair step punch in on each of the two.
Thirty minutes with someone senior, then the three moves in order. Apply below.
Medium on Harry, direct to lens. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, APPLY IN 60 SECONDS. Cut hard, no black tail.
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: An answer engine is already describing your business to buyers, unsupervised, assembled from sources you did not write and cannot see, and you have never once read the description it gives.
Verbal hook, curiosity gap statementThere is a paragraph about your business being read by buyers right now. You have never read it.
Text hook, bold statementAn AI is describing your company to your customers today. Unsupervised.
Visual hook, pre loaded object openHarry turns a monitor to face the lens. The answer on screen is deliberately out of focus. He rack focuses for one beat, then cuts before it is legible.
There is a paragraph about your business you have never read.
Harry rotates a monitor toward the lens. The rotation supplies the motion in frame one. Screen text deliberately soft. Text hook: YOU HAVE NOT READ THIS.
It is what the AI says when someone asks about you. Written by nobody. Assembled.
Rack focus so the answer sharpens for one beat, then cut before it is legible. Use a real audit screen with the client name blurred. Never a mocked up quote.
Might be right. Might be a service you stopped selling three years ago.
Cut to Harry seated, static medium, hands resting. Flat delivery, no eyebrow. Let it sit.
You approve every line on your website. You have never seen this one.
Slow push in to 150 percent across the line. Subtitles just below center, outside the UI safe zone.
We read it back to you on the call. Free. Thirty minutes. Plus your score.
Cut to scorecard graphic, six criteria, score revealed. Keep any real client detail blurred.
Someone senior, not a junior with a template. Apply below.
Medium on Harry, direct to lens, hands still. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, 8 QUESTIONS, 60 SECONDS. Hard cut on the last word.
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: The content you already paid for is being read and used to build the answer while a different company gets named inside it, so your content budget is producing the recommendation and not the customer.
Verbal hook, bold statementYour content is getting read. It is just being used to recommend somebody else.
Text hook, sarcastic confessionFour years of content. Built a genuinely good answer for a competitor.
Visual hook, hands busy talkerOverhead on Harry plating a dish, hands already moving. He finishes it, slides the plate across the table, and it stops in front of an empty chair.
Your content is getting read. It is just not getting credited.
Overhead on hands plating a dish, already in motion as the frame opens. Warm kitchen light. Text hook: READ. USED. UNCREDITED.
The engine takes what you published, builds the answer, then names a competitor in it.
Hands slide the finished plate across the table. Camera tracks the plate. It stops in front of an empty chair. Hold one beat before cutting.
Four years of content. You are the ingredient. Someone else is the meal.
Cut to Harry across the table, static medium, dry delivery. Empty chair still visible behind him.
Free audit shows you where that is happening, prompt by prompt, and what is missing.
Cut to screen, a list of prompts with competitor names highlighted and the client name absent. Blur real identifiers. One cut per second down the list.
We grew LLM brand mentions for an Atlanta retailer by six twenty one percent.
Lower third card: SYLVANE, ATLANTA. 621 PERCENT LLM BRAND MENTION GROWTH. Hold two full seconds so it can be read.
Thirty minutes, someone senior. Apply below, it takes a minute.
Medium on Harry, direct to lens, hands still. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, 8 QUESTIONS, 60 SECONDS. Cut hard on the last word.
Headlines
Primary text
Reason to buy: Citation position compounds, so taking a position back off whoever holds it costs more than taking it while it is open, which makes waiting for certainty the most expensive decision on the table rather than the cautious one.
Verbal hook, bold statementBeing named second costs more to fix than being named first cost to win. That is the whole argument.
Text hook, intriguing questionWhat does it cost you to be the second name?
Visual hook, hands busy talkerOverhead on Harry stacking coins into two piles of very different heights, hands already stacking as the frame opens. He keeps adding to the tall one the entire time he talks.
Being named second costs more than being named first.
Overhead on hands already stacking coins into two piles as the frame opens. Hard side light, deep shadow. Text hook: SECOND COSTS MORE.
Nothing to do with our pricing. Taking a position back off someone is harder.
Hands keep adding to the taller stack while he talks. Never stop the hands. Slow push in on the two piles.
Every month a competitor holds it, they get quoted, repeated, corroborated. It feeds itself.
Cut to Harry, static medium, seated, unhurried. Let a full beat of silence sit after the word itself.
Which makes waiting to see if this is real the expensive option. Not the careful one.
Punch in 150 percent across the line. Subtitles just below center. No music swell, keep the bed flat under him.
The free audit tells you where you sit today. And who is named instead.
Cut to scorecard graphic, six criteria, score revealed, then the citation gap list. One cut per second.
Thirty minutes with someone senior. Apply below, eight questions.
Medium on Harry, direct to lens, hands finally still. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, APPLY IN 60 SECONDS. Hard cut, no tail.
Headlines
Primary text
These six were written as confirmation-page breakout modules under SOP-28, and they belong to this library too. Film them vertical and they serve both jobs.
Straight answer: it's a conversation with a senior person from my team, and at the end of it we'll tell you whether we think we can help. If we can, we'll say how, and you can decide. If we can't, we'll say that instead. What it isn't is a slide deck and a price reveal. You'll be doing most of the talking, because the useful part is us understanding your market.
The biggest pre-call anxiety. Answering it plainly is worth more than any amount of reassurance elsewhere on the page.
Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).
Because a fair number of the businesses we audit end up asking us to run the plan, and that's how the agency grows. That's the entire model, there's nothing underneath it. We don't sell your data, there's no trial that starts billing, and there's no upsell waiting at the end of the call. If the plan is something your own team should run, we'll tell you that, and you keep it either way.
Same answer as VSL beat 5, deliberately. Repetition from a second angle is what makes it believed.
Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).
Good, most businesses we speak to do, and plenty of those agencies are doing solid work. This isn't a pitch to fire anyone. What we're looking at is specifically AI search, which is the part most agencies haven't built a method for yet, because it's genuinely new and it works differently to ranking. So treat this as a second opinion on one specific thing. You'll get a score, the citations showing who's being recommended instead of you, and three moves. Hand all of it to your current agency the same afternoon if you like. If it turns out you'd rather we ran it, we can talk about that, but that's your call to make after you've seen the work, not before.
The most common real situation for this buyer. The trap is making it a pitch to switch, which triggers loyalty and defensiveness.
Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).
It's the six-part framework we grade you against, and it's the thing I wrote the book on. Rather than give you the acronym, here's what it's actually asking. Can the answer engines read your site properly. Do they have a reason to trust it. Is what you publish structured so a machine can lift an answer out of it and attribute that answer to you. Are you being cited anywhere the engines already look. Six signals, each scored, and the reason it's six rather than four hundred is that these are the ones that decide whether you get recommended. On the call we go through your score on each one and which to fix first.
Filming this saves ten minutes of definitions on every single call. Highest time-saving module of the six.
Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).
Traditional SEO competes for a position on a page of ten links. AI search competes to be one of two or three businesses a machine names in an answer. That difference sounds small and it changes almost everything. There's no second page to creep up from, you're either in the answer or you're not. Being cited compounds, because engines lean on sources they've already used. And you can't buy your way in, there's no auction. So the work shifts from chasing positions to being the most readable, most corroborated, most quotable source in your category. Your rankings can be completely healthy while this is happening, which is exactly why most owners don't notice until the traffic has already gone.
The category question. Also the one that makes the offer feel urgent without any invented scarcity.
Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).
Before we speak we've already graded your site and pulled the citations, so we're not spending your time gathering information. First five minutes, you tell us what the business actually needs, because the scorecard doesn't know that. Next fifteen, we walk you through what we found: your score on each of the six signals, and specifically where AI is naming competitors instead of you. Last ten, the three moves in priority order and why that order. Then we're done. If there's a version where we run it for you, we'll say so, and if there isn't, we'll say that.
Removes procedural uncertainty, which is a quiet no-show driver.
Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).
The foundational things a prospect wonders once the booking confirmation lands. Answer these and the call starts at the second question instead of the first.
Kills: I keep hearing about AI search. What is it actually, and why would it change anything for a business like mine?
AI search is not a new Google. It is a new middleman.
Start mid-motion. Harry sets a phone face-up on the desk showing an AI answer, then looks up to lens. Direct address, dry, no smile. Text hook in native uploader, block caps, upper third: NOT A NEW GOOGLE. A NEW MIDDLEMAN. Must land with sound off.
Someone used to type a question, get ten blue links, and pick one. Now they ask a model, and they get one paragraph with three or four companies named in it.
Hands busy. Counts the two states on his fingers, ten links then one paragraph. B-roll option: screen recording of a real AI answer for a generic category, company names blurred, cut in at 8s for 3 seconds only.
You are either in that paragraph or you are not. There is no page two. There is no scrolling down to find you. It is a shortlist, and it gets built without you in the room.
Slow down here. Pause a full beat after "or you are not". This is the fear beat, so play it flat, not dramatic. Hold on face, no cutaway.
That is the whole change. Search used to send people to you so they could make up their mind. Now something else makes up their mind first, and then decides whether to send them at all.
Slight lean in. Conversational, like he is explaining it to one person across a table, not presenting.
So when we go through your scorecard, that is the thing we are actually measuring. Not where you rank. Whether you get named.
Settle back. Land it and cut hard on "named". No CTA, no card, no music. Subtitles just below center frame throughout.
The foundational definition piece. Almost everyone who books has heard the term and quietly does not want to admit they cannot define it. This lets them arrive fluent instead of nervous, which raises how honestly they talk on the call. Deliberately reframes the metric from rank to citation, which every other video in the library then leans on. Also works as an organic Reel and as the embedded video on the booking confirmation page.
Kills: Sure, this matters for tech companies. Does it matter for a business in my category, at my size, in my market?
Fair question to be sitting on right now. Does any of this actually apply to your industry, or is it a tech thing.
Open mid-shrug so there is motion in frame at frame one. Even, unbothered delivery. Text hook, block caps: OR IS IT JUST A TECH THING.
Here is the honest test, and it takes about forty seconds. Open ChatGPT. Type: best whatever you sell, in whatever city you sell it. Then read what comes back.
Holds up phone, thumb typing, does not show the screen. Keeping the screen hidden holds curiosity. Delivery is instructional and calm, like giving directions.
It will name three or four businesses. If you are in there, good. If you are not, someone in your category is, and they are being recommended to a buyer who never sees your site, never sees your ads, and never learns you exist.
This is the envy beat, so underplay it. No emphasis, no eyebrow. The line does the work. Hold the shot, no cuts, let it sit for a beat after "exist".
And it does not really matter what you or I think about AI search. Your buyer already asked it. The answer already had names in it. Neither of those is waiting on our opinion.
Small dismissive hand gesture on "what you or I think". Dry. This is the line to shoot twenty times until it sounds thrown away rather than delivered.
Do that search before we talk. Whatever it says, bring it. Good result or bad result, it is the most useful thing you can walk in with.
Direct to lens, unhurried. Cut immediately after "walk in with". No end card.
Kills the biggest silent doubt in the 72 hour window, which is not skepticism about AI search in general, it is a quiet belief that it will not apply to their category. Envy is the amplifier and it is factual, because the model genuinely will name somebody. The homework is the real payload: a prospect who runs that search arrives with a personal stake and a much lower chance of no showing. Also use as SMS content 24 hours before the call.
Kills: I already pay someone for SEO every month. Is this the same job with a new name on it?
If you already pay for SEO, this is the part worth ten seconds of your time. It is not the same job with a new name on it.
Open on a slight tilt up from desk to face for first frame motion. Matter of fact, no defensiveness, this is not a shot at their current agency. Text hook: NOT THE SAME JOB WITH A NEW NAME.
Traditional SEO asks one question. Where do we rank. And a rank is a real place, you can go and look at it, you can screenshot it and put it in a monthly report.
Hands trace a vertical list in the air. Light, almost amused on "put it in a monthly report", never sneering.
AI search asks something different. When someone asks about this category, does the model say our name. That is not a position on a page. It is whether you are part of the answer, and it gets built out of what the rest of the internet says about you, not just what your site says about itself.
The key line is "not just what your site says about itself". Slow it down and hold on it. No cutaway, face only, so the distinction registers. This is the densest beat in the batch, so do not rush the front half to make room, cut a clause on set if it is running hot.
So the work is different, the reporting is different, and a rankings report will never show you that gap. It will look fine right up until it does not.
Flat delivery on the last line. Dry Harry. Do not smile through it. Pause a full beat before the final beat starts.
That is why we grade it separately before we speak. Two different scoreboards. You are probably only reading one of them.
Settle, hold eye contact, cut hard. No music, no sting, no logo.
This is the conceptual separation the whole offer depends on. If they think this is rebadged SEO, the call becomes a price comparison against their current invoice. If they understand it is a second scoreboard they have never seen, the call becomes a diagnosis. Written carefully so it does not attack their existing agency, since that objection belongs to another pillar and attacking it here makes them defensive early. Also strong as a cold organic Reel.
Kills: Who is Harry Sanders and why should I take his read on my business seriously?
You have had some bloke with an Australian accent talking at you about search for a couple of days now. Fair to ask who I am.
Open on a small self aware shrug, motion in frame one. Slightly amused at himself. This piece only works if it is under sold. Text hook: WHO IS THIS GUY.
I started StudioHawk at 17. It was me, in a bedroom, doing SEO for anyone who would pay me. There was no plan past that.
Plain telling, no nostalgia, no inspirational music energy. Optional single still of early days at 9s for two seconds, then straight back to face.
It is now teams in Melbourne, London and Atlanta, 120 plus specialists, and it has been named best large SEO agency seven times.
Rattle this off quickly and slightly flat. The credentials should sound like admin, not like a boast. Optional lower third text listing the three cities, block caps, out of the safe zone.
Forbes 30 Under 30 happened. Forbes and BBC World News happened. I only mention any of it because you are about to hand over 30 minutes, and you should know who you are handing it to.
Direct to lens. The justification line is the point, deliver it as a courtesy rather than a flex.
That is the CV. On the call it is worth almost nothing. What matters is what your scorecard says.
Cut hard on "says". No end card, no logo, no music.
Familiarity and identity. Mere exposure only converts to trust if the face has a name and a story attached, and this gives them both in under a minute. The self deflating close is doing real work: it signals the call is about them, not a 30 minute credential parade, which is exactly the fear a sophisticated buyer has after booking with a founder led agency. Sits early in the 72 hour rotation, ideally touch two or three.
Kills: Is this an actual agency with actual clients, or a slick funnel with one guy behind it?
Reasonable thing to be wondering after you book. Is this a real agency, or a very good funnel.
Direct to camera, first frame already mid sentence. No defensiveness. Say it like he has heard it before and thinks it is a fair thing to ask. Text hook: REAL AGENCY, OR GOOD FUNNEL.
We run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. That is the normal set of receipts and you can go and check all of it.
Quick, unemotional list. Optional clean lower third with the three names, block caps. Do not linger, the logos are not the point of this video.
Here is the one I would actually check though. Samsung came to us because ChatGPT recommended us. Not an ad, not a referral, not someone we already knew. A model got asked who to use, and it said our name.
This is the beat. Slow right down. Full stop before "Samsung". Hold on face, no cutaway, no text overlay competing with the line. Shoot this take many times until it sounds like a fact and not a brag.
I bring it up because it is the exact thing we are going to look at on your site. We are not selling you a theory about how buyers might behave one day. It is how one of our own clients found us.
Hands settle. Even, grounded, quiet confidence. No emphasis needed, the previous beat carries it.
Everything else on that list is just the reason we are allowed to talk about it.
Dry close, small pause, cut hard. No music, no sting.
Legitimacy plus mechanism proof in one piece, which is why the Samsung fact leads over the client logos. Logos prove the agency is real. Samsung proves the thing we are about to grade them on is real and already producing revenue for us, which is much harder to argue with. Deliberately does not use the Sylvane or organic traffic results, because this video is about whether we exist, not whether we get results, and those belong to a separate piece. Also works well as the second video in a reminder email.
Kills: What is this framework you are grading me against, and do I need to understand it before the call?
SOURC-E. You are going to see that word on your scorecard, so here is what it is before it turns up.
Open holding a printed scorecard page, tilt it up into frame at frame one, then set it down. Do not let the page be readable. Text hook: WHAT IS SOURC-E.
It is six things that decide whether an answer engine names you when somebody asks about your category. I wrote the book on it, which is still a slightly odd sentence to say out loud.
Throwaway delivery on the book line. Small shrug. It must not sound like a credential drop, it is an aside.
The acronym is not the point. The point is that without a framework, AI visibility is a vibe. Someone tells you that you need to be more authoritative, you nod, nobody measures anything, and in 90 days you still cannot tell whether it worked.
This is the frustration beat and it will be the most recognized moment in the video. Hands out, palms up on "you nod". Slightly weary, like he has sat in that meeting.
Six parts. A grade on each one. So you can see which ones are actually costing you, and which ones you can stop worrying about for now.
Counts on fingers. Optional simple text overlay: SIX PARTS. A GRADE ON EACH. No fancy graphics, no animated framework diagram, keep it phone quality.
And you do not need to study any of it before we talk. It is our job to explain the grade. It is not your job to learn the framework.
Direct to lens, unhurried, warm but flat. Cut hard on "framework". No end card.
Removes the low grade dread that the call will be an exam they have not studied for. This audience is not trying to learn SEO, so the closing permission line is the most important sentence in the piece. Naming that the framework produces a grade also pre sells the format of the call without pitching anything, because they arrive expecting a scorecard rather than a chat. The line about what they can stop worrying about is deliberate: it signals we will tell them what to ignore, which is the fastest available trust signal against a vendor who wants to sell everything. Kept deliberately vague on how many parts will or will not matter, since that is decided by their actual scorecard, not by a script.
The foundational things a prospect wonders once the booking confirmation lands. Answer these and the call starts at the second question instead of the first.
Kills: If AI engines are already recommending a competitor over me, how did they actually get there? What did they do that I didn't?
The most common thing people ask me after they book this call is, how did the other guy get in there.
Direct to camera, vertical, phone at eye level. Start mid thought, no greeting, no intro card. Plain room, natural light. Hands still.
The honest answer is nobody bought their way in. There's no ad slot inside an AI answer. Not yet, anyway.
Dry and flat. Small shrug on the last line. Do not smile. Half second pause after "anyway" before the cut.
Usually one page on their site answers the question cleanly. Straight answer near the top, plain language. And a few other places online say the same thing about them. That's it. The model picks whatever is easiest to quote and easiest to check.
Cut to a screen recording of an assistant answer with the citation panel open, competitor brand names blurred. Voice continues over the b-roll, come back to face on "easiest to check".
Your site probably answers that same question. It's just answering it like a brochure. Three scrolls down, wrapped in a value proposition, in language no one would ever quote back.
Cut to a scroll of a generic corporate page, brand blurred, scrolling past hero and stat bar before any actual answer appears. Deliver "like a brochure" with a slight head tilt, observational not sneering.
When we talk, I'll show you the page the engine is actually pulling from in your category. It's usually less impressive than people expect. Which is the good news.
Back to camera. Land "which is the good news" quietly and stop. Hold one beat, then cut. No sign off, no smile into the cut.
This is the anchor piece of the pillar. Once someone accepts they aren't being cited, the very next thought is envy: what did they do that I didn't. Answering the mechanism plainly, and making it sound achievable rather than mystical, turns envy into appetite before the call. Also works as a standalone Reel on organic, and as a follow up asset for anyone who booked but rescheduled.
Kills: Now that I know I'm not getting cited, how long does it realistically take to fix? Weeks, months, or is this a two year project?
This is usually the second question, right after, am I behind. How long until one of these things actually says my name.
Direct to camera, unhurried. Hands out of frame. Say it like you're repeating someone else's question back to them.
Two different answers, and the difference matters. A single answer can move quickly. When a page is genuinely built to be quoted, it can get picked up faster than a ranking ever moved. That part surprises people.
Two fingers up on "two different answers", then drop the hand and leave it down. No selling tone, no lift at the end of the sentence.
Becoming the default takes longer. Being the name that comes up whether someone asks in ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google's AI answers, phrased five different ways, on a Tuesday. That one takes months, and anyone who gives you a date is guessing.
Slow the pace across the list. Cut to a quick screen recording of the same question typed into three different assistants, brand names blurred, then back to face on "anyone who gives you a date".
The part worth understanding is that it compounds. Once you're the source that gets cited, you get repeated, and being repeated is what gets you cited again. Sylvane, a retailer in Atlanta, grew their brand mentions across the language models by 621 percent.
Say the number once, flatly, and move on. No zoom, no emphasis, no animated graphic. A plain static number card is the most it should get.
Which also means being cited second costs more to fix later than being cited first cost to win. We'll look at where you sit on that.
Straight to lens, level delivery, no urgency in the voice. Stop after "that", hold a beat, cut.
Timeline is the question that decides whether they show up with real expectations or with a fantasy. Giving them the honest split, fast for one answer and slow for the default position, buys enormous credibility before the call and pre frames the only permitted urgency argument: citation position compounds. Reusable in nurture email as a text version, and in the pre call reminder sequence at hour 24.
Kills: Is AI search a separate program on top of the SEO I already pay for, or does it replace it? Am I about to be sold a second budget?
The follow up I get to almost everything I've just said. Is this instead of my SEO, or on top of it.
Direct to camera, conversational, like you're answering across a table. Slightly closer framing than the other pieces in this set.
Neither, and I'd rather say that now than on the call. It's the same ground, read by a different reader. These engines crawl the same pages and the same mentions your rankings already run on.
Flat, matter of fact. No hand movement at all. This one earns trust by being boring.
What changes is what wins. Ranking rewards the page that looks the most authoritative. Getting cited rewards the page that's easiest to quote accurately. Related jobs. Not the same job. And most sites only do the first one. Often very well.
Cut to split screen b-roll: a long polished service page on one side, a short clean answer block on the other. No labels, no arrows. Back to face on "often very well".
So it isn't a bolt on department. Mostly it's the same work aimed slightly differently, plus a measurement layer you don't have right now.
Back to camera, even tone. Do not lean in on "measurement layer", it should sound like a fact, not a hook.
Some of your pages are probably already close. Finding those is the first thing we do, before anyone talks about building anything.
End on "anything". Clean cut, no trailing beat.
Kills the quiet suspicion that they booked a call where they'll be sold a whole second retainer. Framing AI search as the same substrate read by a different reader keeps the conversation inside the budget they already believe in, so they arrive open instead of defensive. Also a strong reply asset when a prospect emails back with "we already spend on SEO" before the call.
Kills: Search still brings in most of my leads. If we start chasing AI citations, am I risking the rankings that are already paying the bills?
This is the one that keeps people up before the call, and it's the right question. If we go chasing citations, what happens to the rankings I already have.
Direct to camera, slower than the rest of the set. Treat it seriously. No reassuring smile, no soft voice.
Nothing. And I'd be suspicious of anyone whose answer to that is complicated. There's no switch. You're not moving your site from one mode into another.
Say "Nothing." flat and let it sit for a full half second of silence before continuing. The pause is the reassurance.
It's the same kind of work. Answer the question earlier on the page. Get mentioned accurately in more places. Google has rewarded all of that for years. These engines just read it more literally.
Cut to b-roll of a page being edited, an answer paragraph physically dragged up above the fold. Simple screen capture, no cursor theatrics.
The real risk isn't losing rankings. It's spending a quarter rewriting pages that were already fine. That's what the scorecard is for. It tells you what to leave alone.
Back to camera. Land "it tells you what to leave alone" as the point of the whole video. Slight slow down on that sentence.
Bring the pages you're proudest of. Those are usually the interesting ones.
Casual, almost an afterthought, like you just remembered it. Cut on the last word.
Risk aversion is the number one silent no show driver for an established business with working search. This piece converts fear into curiosity by reframing the actual downside as wasted effort, not lost traffic, and it hands them a small pre call task that raises attendance. Good candidate for hour 48 of the retargeting window, once the earlier explainers have landed.
Kills: Now that I understand roughly how citations work, could my marketing team just do this themselves? Do I actually need you for it?
A few people have asked me a version of this between booking and the call. Could my team just do this in-house.
Direct to camera, relaxed posture. This is the least defensive video in the set, play it that way. No arms crossed.
Mostly yes, and I mean it. The on-page part isn't mysterious. A good marketing manager can rewrite a page so it answers the question in the first line instead of the fourth paragraph.
No hedging face, no qualifier eyebrow. Say it like you believe it, because giving this away is the entire point of the piece.
Two things are hard. Knowing which questions actually matter in your category, because it's never the ones you'd guess. And measuring any of it. Citations don't show up in Analytics. There's no rank tracker that tells you a model quietly stopped naming you last month.
Cut to a screen recording of a standard analytics dashboard, scroll it slowly, then cut back to face. The joke is silent: the dashboard says nothing about this.
So the gap usually isn't effort. It's instruments. Nobody I speak to is lazy about this. They're just working hard on a report that only measures the part that's shrinking.
Slow right down here. This is the line that lands. Hold eye contact through the whole beat, no b-roll over it.
Which is why you keep the scorecard and the three moves either way. If you take it in-house and do it properly, good. That's a much better year than finding out in twelve months that someone else wrote the answer first.
Straight to lens, no urgency in the voice, no pitch inflection. End flat and cut immediately.
The in-house question is usually a politeness cover for do I actually need this call. Conceding the easy half openly, and locating the real gap in measurement rather than effort, makes the call feel useful regardless of outcome and lowers the pressure they're bracing for. Doubles as a strong organic Reel and as the answer to a post call stall.
Kills: This all sounds like it's for consumer brands. Does any of it apply if I sell something unglamorous to a few hundred businesses?
If you're sitting there thinking, this is all very nice but I sell industrial pumps to four hundred companies, stay with me.
Direct to camera, handheld is fine and preferred here. Slightly amused, never mocking. You are on their side of the joke.
Boring is an advantage. Ask one of these engines for the best running shoe and there are thousands of sources fighting over it. Ask who supplies a specific part in a specific state, and there might only be a handful of pages on the internet that answer it properly.
Cut to a screen recording of a narrow B2B style question typed into an assistant, showing a short citation list of three or four sources. Brand names blurred.
Thin ground is cheap to take. In most B2B categories, the reason a competitor gets named isn't that they're better than you. It's that they were the only one who bothered to write the answer down.
Back to face, flat delivery. Do not push this line or add emphasis. It does its own work.
And the buyers are there. Samsung found us through a ChatGPT recommendation. Not an ad, not a referral. Someone asked, and we were the answer.
Say the Samsung line once and move straight on. No graphic, no logo, no smile. Understating it is the whole effect.
Before we speak I'll run the real questions from your category, not generic ones. You'll see how contested it actually is instead of guessing.
Even tone, no build. End on "guessing", hold a beat, cut.
Relevance doubt is the specific reason B2B and industrial bookers ghost: they assume the material is built for consumer brands and they'll waste half an hour. Turning boring into an advantage flips the doubt into an edge, and the Samsung line proves the buyer behavior exists in exactly the sober, unglamorous way they'd need to believe it. Use it early in the window for any booker whose application flags a niche or industrial category, and as a standalone piece on LinkedIn.
Price, time, skepticism, competitor, and the quiet one: is this a disguised sales pitch. Handled on video before the call so they do not have to raise them live.
Kills: "I booked a free audit call. This is going to be thirty minutes of someone pitching me a retainer."
You've booked, and somewhere in the back of your head there's a voice going: this is a pitch, isn't it.
Direct to camera, medium shot, standing. No smile on the first line. Deadpan. Let the last four words land flat like he's saying it for them.
Fair thought. Most free audits are a pitch wearing a lab coat. Someone reads your own homepage back to you for a while and then lands on a pricing slide.
Small shrug on "fair thought". Slight dry lift on "lab coat", no laugh. B-roll option: two seconds of a generic slide deck landing on a pricing slide, cut fast, no numbers legible.
Here's what actually happens on yours. The work is already done before you show up. Your SOURC-E scorecard, and the list of places an AI engine names a competitor in your category instead of you.
Punch in tighter. Slow the pace down here, this is the reassurance beat. B-roll: over-shoulder of a real scorecard on screen, competitor name blurred out.
Thirty minutes. We go through what's broken, in what order, and the three moves that close the biggest gap first. You keep all of it.
Back to medium. Count the three things on fingers, hands stay busy. Flat delivery on "you keep all of it", do not sell it.
For context, we've been named best large SEO agency seven times and we run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. This is not a hustle. It's how we work out whether we're useful to you.
Say the credentials fast and slightly bored, like reading a bio he did not write. That is what makes it land. Text overlay: 7x BEST LARGE SEO AGENCY.
If you want us to do the work at the end, say so and we'll talk. If you don't, you walk off with the plan. I'm not going to chase you.
Hold direct eye line. Stop talking a beat before the cut. No CTA card, no logo sting, hard cut to black.
Kills the single biggest cancel and no-show driver in the 72 hour window. Every other objection piece is easier to hear once this one has run, so it should be first in the retarget rotation and highest frequency. Also works as the first reply in the confirmation email sequence and as the pinned video on the booking confirmation page.
Kills: "We already pay an agency for this. Taking this call feels disloyal, and it's probably a waste if we're not switching."
So you've already got an agency, and now you've booked a call with another one. Feels a bit disloyal.
Direct to camera, seated, relaxed. Say it like he's naming the thing they haven't said out loud. Light, not accusing.
It isn't. I'm not going to ask you to fire anybody. Genuinely. Plenty of the businesses I talk to have an agency doing perfectly good work.
Open palms once on "genuinely", then hands settle. Unhurried. This is the permission beat, do not rush it.
Here's the useful part though. Ask them one question before we speak. Ask them where you get cited in AI answers, and where a competitor gets cited instead of you. Not rankings. Citations. Two different things.
Lean in slightly. Hold up one finger on "one question". Text overlay on "Not rankings. Citations." B-roll: an AI answer on a phone screen with a company name highlighted.
If they come back with a number, brilliant, you're in good hands and you'll get very little out of me. If they go quiet, that isn't them being bad at their job. It just means it isn't being measured, and you'd have had no way of knowing that.
Genuinely warm on "brilliant". Then flatten out. Do not gloat on the second half, the whole piece dies if it sounds like a swipe at their agency.
Bring them on the call if you want. I don't mind. It's awkward for about ninety seconds and then it's just useful for everyone.
Small shrug, half smile on "ninety seconds". Cut on the word "everyone", no outro.
This is the biggest identity conflict for an established buyer and the objection they will never raise on the call, they will just cancel instead. The reframe deliberately gives them a job to do with their current agency, which converts guilt into curiosity. Reusable as a LinkedIn post and as an in-call talk track when the prospect discloses an incumbent.
Kills: "Our rankings are strong. We already win search. What could an AI audit possibly tell me?"
Some of you have booked this call while sitting at number one on Google, quietly wondering what on earth I could tell you.
Direct to camera, standing, arms loose. Dry, almost amused. No edge in the voice.
Congratulations, seriously, that took work. Here's the uncomfortable bit. Ranking first and getting cited are now two separate jobs, and most people are only doing one of them.
Genuine on "congratulations". Then a beat of silence before "here's the uncomfortable bit". The pause does the work.
Someone asks an AI engine for the best supplier in your category. It doesn't hand back ten blue links. It names two or three companies and that's the shortlist. Your number one ranking didn't fail there. It just wasn't in the room.
B-roll here, full screen: a real query typed into an AI engine, answer resolving, two or three brand names visible, competitor names blurred. Harry voice over. Come back to face for "wasn't in the room".
Samsung found us through a ChatGPT recommendation. Not an ad, not a referral. A machine named us and they got in touch. That is not a future thing, that already happened.
Straight to camera, completely flat delivery. No emphasis, no eyebrow. The fact is the flex, the tone must not be. Text overlay: SAMSUNG. VIA CHATGPT.
And this is the part that matters for you. Citation position compounds. Whoever gets named this year gets named more next year, because being the answer is what makes you the answer. Being second costs more to fix later than being first cost to win.
Slow right down. Simple hand gesture, one level then a higher level. This is the only urgency argument in the whole library, do not decorate it.
So being number one isn't the answer to the question. It's just what you had before the question changed.
Hold still. Say it once, don't repeat it, cut on the last word.
Aimed at the strongest prospects in the batch, the ones most likely to cancel because they feel they have nothing to learn. Carries the only permitted urgency argument, compounding citation position, so it is the piece that converts a booked call into a call they actually want. Doubles as a cold acquisition hook and as an opening slide framing on the call itself.
Kills: "AI search advice is generic. My category is niche and none of this will apply to my business."
Everybody says it. My industry's different. And honestly, they're usually half right.
Direct to camera, medium. Say "everybody says it" like he has heard it four times this week, because he has.
Your industry is different. The buying cycle is different, the language is different, your customers ask questions nobody outside your world would even think to ask.
Nod along, concede properly. Do not undercut this beat, the concession is what buys the next one.
What isn't different is that somebody typed one of those questions into an AI engine this morning and got back an answer with a company name in it. That name is either yours or it's somebody else's. There's no third option.
Punch in. Flat, factual. Text overlay on "either yours or somebody else's". B-roll: a niche sounding query resolving into an answer with a highlighted brand name.
Which is why we pull your actual category before the call, not a template. Your questions, your competitors. Sylvane is a retailer in Atlanta, probably nothing like what you do, and their brand mentions in the language models went up 621 percent. The method travels even when the industry doesn't.
Hands busy, maybe turning a laptop toward camera. Overlay: 621% LLM BRAND MENTIONS. Say the number once and move on.
You'll be looking at your own category on the screen. And if it turns out you're already the named answer everywhere, I'll tell you that as well.
Small shrug on the last line. Honest, unbothered. Hard cut.
Kills the relevance doubt that makes sophisticated buyers cancel late, and does it with the strongest amplifier available, envy, because the competitor citation is pulled live and specific to them. The concession structure, agree fully then pivot on one fact, is the reusable spine for any "my industry is different" objection across the funnel.
Kills: "Nothing senior is free. What's the catch, what am I actually paying with?"
Question I get after people book. What's the catch. Why is this free.
Direct to camera, tight. No preamble, start mid thought like he's answering a message.
There's no catch, but there is a reason. Doing this properly takes a senior person a few hours before you ever show up. We've got 120 plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta, so those hours cost us something. We're not pretending otherwise.
Matter of fact, slightly bored with his own explanation. Text overlay: MELBOURNE. LONDON. ATLANTA. B-roll option: someone actually working through a scorecard on a screen.
We do it because it's the fastest honest way to find out if we should work together. Once your site's graded and the citation gap is pulled, one of two things is true. Either there's real ground to take and you can see it right there on the screen, or there isn't much, and we've both saved ourselves a quarter of pretending.
Slow down on "one of two things is true". Hold up two fingers, then drop the hand. Dry landing on "a quarter of pretending".
So free isn't the hook. The scorecard is either uncomfortable or it isn't, and you'll know inside about ten minutes.
Straight to camera, still. This is the credibility beat, no movement, no overlay.
You keep it either way. That's the whole model. There's no version of this where you leave with nothing.
Even tone, no lift on the last line. Cut immediately.
Sophisticated buyers price free as suspicious, and unresolved suspicion shows up as a no-show rather than a question. Naming the real cost to us and the real reason converts suspicion into respect. Also useful as an FAQ answer on the booking confirmation page and as a rebuttal in setter follow up messages.
Kills: "I'm not technical and I don't have thirty minutes to sit there confused while someone talks about schema and crawl budgets."
Small thing that stops people showing up. I'm not technical enough for this call.
Direct to camera, seated, casual, coffee in hand. Say it like he's repeating something a real person told him.
You don't need to be. Nothing on this call requires you to know what a sitemap is. The technical part is our problem, not yours.
Relaxed, hands busy with the cup. Zero condescension in the delivery, this whole piece dies on tone.
Nobody's going to make you defend your website. There's no quiz. And if one of our lot starts saying schema markup and canonical tags at you, stop them and make them say it again in English. That's a completely reasonable thing to ask for and we'll do it.
Lean in on "stop them". Slight smile. B-roll option: a scorecard on screen shown in plain language, one line per issue, no jargon visible.
It's thirty minutes. You don't prepare anything, you don't bring reports, you don't need a login. The work is finished before you arrive.
Count the three things off, one hand. Unhurried, this is the pressure release beat.
Show up with your calendar open and an honest opinion of your own website. That's it.
Say it, stop, cut. No sign off, no logo.
Removes the quiet embarrassment objection that a marketing manager or non technical owner will never voice, they simply reschedule and then ghost. Also lowers the bar on time by making thirty minutes feel like it costs them nothing to prepare for. Pairs directly with the Expectations pillar piece on who is on the call, and works as a reminder message ninety minutes before the call.
What the call is, who is on it, what to have open, what happens after. Procedural uncertainty is a silent no-show driver, and this pillar is the cheapest fix for it.
Kills: I booked it, but what is this call actually going to be? Thirty minutes of someone asking me qualifying questions before they pitch me?
Thirty minutes is not long, so here is exactly how we spend yours.
Vertical 9:16, phone camera, seated at a desk, window light. Hard cut in on the first word. No greeting, no name card, no music. Flat, unhurried delivery. Optional on screen text: THE 30 MINUTES.
First five minutes, we skip the discovery. We already graded your site before you joined, so we put your scorecard up and walk you through where it is weak.
Hold the same frame. Count the five on one hand, low and casual, do not perform it. Optional b-roll cutaway: a blurred scorecard on a laptop screen.
The next ten is the part people go quiet for. We show you the questions your buyers are typing into AI, and who gets named in the answer. Sometimes that is you. Usually it is a competitor.
Slow down on the last two lines. No emphasis, let the fact do it. B-roll option: screen recording of an answer engine returning an answer with brand names visible, faces and client names blurred.
Then ten minutes on three moves. Not thirty moves. The three that close the biggest part of that gap, in the order we would actually do them.
Back to camera. Dry. Slight shrug on not thirty moves.
Last five is your questions. There is no deck, there is nothing to sign, and the plan is yours either way. If you want us to run it, that is a different conversation on a different day.
Even tone through to the end. Do not smile up at the last line. Cut immediately, no outro.
This is the spine of the pillar. It kills the quiet dread that a free call is thirty minutes of qualifying questions and a pitch, and it gives them a mental map so the calendar hold feels like a real appointment instead of a sales trap. Also works as the first video in the sequence after booking, and as the body of the confirmation email.
Kills: Is a junior setter going to read me a script for thirty minutes and then book me in with someone senior?
Fair question after you book something that costs nothing. Who am I actually getting on this call.
Vertical 9:16, direct to camera, mid thought. No music. Slightly conversational, like answering a question someone just asked off camera.
It is a senior person from our team. Not a setter, not somebody reading a script off a second screen. Someone who runs search for businesses your size and bigger.
Steady. Do not lean in on senior, say it like a fact you are mildly bored of repeating.
We are a hundred and twenty plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta. We run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. And we have been named best large SEO agency seven times.
Deliver the credentials flat and fast, like reading a line off a form. Do not stack text overlays on every claim, one small lower third at most.
The reason that matters is that nobody on this call has to go and check with somebody. You get an actual answer to whatever you ask, including if the answer is that you do not have a problem yet.
Land the last clause plainly and stop. No reassuring smile. Hard cut.
Removes the single biggest reason sophisticated buyers no show a free call: they assume the first thirty minutes is a screening layer. Naming that they may be told they do not have a problem is what makes the rest of it believable. Reusable as a reply to any prospect who asks who they are meeting.
Kills: Have they actually looked at my site, or am I about to get a generic presentation with my logo dropped into it?
Something people do not expect. The audit happens before the call, not on it.
Vertical 9:16, direct to camera, standing or seated, phone quality fine. No music. Open cold on the line.
Between now and your call we grade your site against SOURC-E. Six parts. It is the framework I wrote the book on, so it is not a checklist somebody downloaded.
Say the book line in passing, not as a boast. If you have a physical copy nearby, do not hold it up, let it sit in frame.
Then we go and ask the answer engines the questions your buyers ask, and we write down who they name. That list is the whole point. It is not an opinion, it is what is on the screen when a customer goes looking.
Slight pause before that list is the whole point. B-roll option: a typed query and a returned answer, competitor names blurred.
So by the time you join, your scorecard and your citation gap are already open on our side.
Back to camera, matter of fact.
You are not walking us through your business for twenty minutes. We have done that part. You just tell us where we read it wrong.
Deliver the last line lightly, almost as an aside. Cut on it.
Kills the will this be generic doubt, which is the number one silent reason a booked call gets deprioritized. It also flips their job on the call from being interrogated to correcting us, which is a role they enjoy and will show up for. Pull the last beat as a standalone caption for the reminder email.
Kills: Do I need to prepare anything? Should I pull reports or get my agency on the call?
People keep asking what to prepare. Short answer, nothing.
Vertical 9:16, direct to camera, handheld is fine here. No music. Say it quickly, it is a small piece.
You do not need to pull reports. You do not need your agency on the call. You do not need to know what SOURC-E stands for.
Three quick beats, do not count them on fingers. Keep it light.
If you want to be useful to yourself, do one thing. Write down the name of one competitor you would hate to lose to. We will check live whether the answer engines name them instead of you.
Slow down for the last sentence. This is the line the whole video exists for. Do not name any company. Optional on screen text: ONE COMPETITOR. WRITE IT DOWN.
Other than that, a laptop beats a phone. There is a screen share and you will want to see it properly.
Casual. Optional cutaway of a laptop with a screen share running, contents blurred.
That is the whole prep. Takes a minute.
Cut immediately after. No sign off.
Two jobs. It removes the friction excuse of I have not had time to prepare, which is what people tell themselves when they cancel, and it plants a small pre call commitment that makes attendance feel like something they started. The one competitor line is the envy hook and it costs the viewer nothing to comply with.
Kills: My week has blown up, or I am second guessing this. Do I just quietly not show?
Small thing, and I would rather say it now than be precious about it later.
Vertical 9:16, direct to camera, relaxed, lower energy than the other pieces. No music. This one should feel like a note, not a message.
If your week falls apart before the call, move it. There is a link in your confirmation email, it takes about ten seconds, and it costs you nothing with us.
Point loosely off camera on confirmation email. Optional b-roll: a reschedule link being clicked, times grayed out, nothing counted down.
The reason I am asking you to move it rather than just not turn up is that senior time on the calendar is the one thing we are genuinely short of. Release the slot and somebody else uses it.
Say it plainly. No guilt, no numbers, no spots left. If it sounds like pressure, do the take again slower.
And the honest reason not to push it out too far. Citation position compounds. Whoever gets named in your category this quarter becomes the default answer next quarter, and being second costs more to fix later than being first cost to win.
This is the only urgency argument in the batch. Deliver it as an observation, not a warning. Steady, no build.
So move it if you need to. Just move it.
Half smile at most. Cut.
Directly attacks the no show. Giving explicit permission to reschedule converts a ghost into a rebooking, and it is the only place in the library where the compounding cost argument is allowed to appear, so it lands harder for being the exception. Send this one late in the 72 hour window, ideally the evening before.