Leave feedback right here. Select any text to comment on it, or hover a block and click the + in the left margin. "Suggest edit" prefills the current wording so you can rewrite it. Everything saves to the server, so anyone on any browser sees the same threads.

Film Day: Call Funnel Ads

Every ad for the free audit · Funnel HQ
← Webinar film day

One shoot, 104 takes

Every ad the free audit funnel needs, beat by beat. Two libraries: the direct response ads that acquire the application, and the Hammer Them library that runs in the 72 hours between someone booking and taking the call. Spoken lines in big type so you can read them off the screen, stage directions underneath, and a tick per take that remembers where you got to in this browser.

The VSL itself is not on this page. It is a different shoot with a different setup, and it lives at /call-vsl and /call-confirmation-vsl.

17 unique angles (SOP-31) 51 hooks, 24 bodies Hammer Them: 29 shorts (SOP-02) Vertical 9:16 for the whole Hammer batch Comment on any line, bottom right The framework VSL script (separate shoot)
Why this is its own shoot: everything here sells a conversation. The pack at /ads-webinar sells a webinar seat and ends every angle on "save your seat", so none of it can point at /vsl. Different offer, different call to action, batch them apart. The VSL and confirmation videos are a third shoot again, and they are not on this page.

How the ad layers stack for this funnel

Jeremy has a different SOP for each stage, and they are not alternatives, they run at the same time on different audiences. The two on this page are the two we can film in one session.

  • Cold, warm the room. Forester (SOP-15) or Venus Fly Trap (SOP-14): 5 to 12 content pieces in a spider web, one view makes someone warm, roughly a cent per engagement. Not filmed here, this is the reels library.
  • Warm, get the application. The direct response ads below. SOP-26/27 structure, SOP-31 diversity. Filmed here.
  • Booked, protect the show. Hammer Them (SOP-02): 15 to 20+ short vertical pieces in the 72 hours before the call. Filmed here.
  • No showed, recover. SOP-06 prescribes video texts plus a $5 to $10 a day retargeting pool. Same Hammer library, different audience. No new filming.
The Hammer Them library pays for itself three times. SOP-02 wants it as pre-call retargeting. SOP-28 wants short breakout answers on the confirmation page. SOP-06 wants no-show retargeting creative. All three want the same thing: short, direct, one-objection-per-video. Film it once, deploy it in all three places. Six of the pieces below are marked as confirmation-page modules for that reason.
SOP-31, and why the angle count matters: Meta's Andromeda update punishes low creative diversity, and the old 3 to 4 creatives a week approach is dead. The requirement is 15 to 20 completely unique ads a month, each built around a genuinely different reason to buy, not variations of one hook. That is why the angles below are organized by reason to buy rather than by hook. Variations of one idea count as one ad.
Revenue bar settled: it is $1M+, everywhere. The Call VSL script, the /call landing page, the application, the nurture and every ad on this page now agree. The only places $250k still appears are the answer bands on the application form and the topic-test questions, which are measurement buckets rather than a promise, so a sub-million business can still apply and be routed by the auto-score.
Shot List (B-roll to capture once)

Capture these while the camera is up

  • Screen capture of an AI answer naming competitors, with no StudioHawk in it
  • Over-shoulder laptop shot of a site being graded against the framework
  • Screen share of the audit output: the scorecard, then the fix-first list
  • Office wide shot and the awards shelf, quick and unfussy
  • To camera, point at the CTA, hard cut to an end card
  • The booking confirmation screen
  • A live ChatGPT answer naming two or three businesses in a category, none of them us (carries five of the seven ad angles)
  • The six-signal scorecard filling in, then the fix-first list, shot clean enough to use as a full-screen cutaway
  • A plain blue-links results page next to an AI answer, for the "the click is being resolved before it reaches you" beat
  • A monthly SEO report PDF being scrolled, for the second-opinion angle
  • Vertical setup. The whole Hammer Them batch is 9:16, so either shoot it on a phone or reframe. Do not crop 16:9 down and hope, it reads as an afterthought in a feed.
  • No music. SOP-02 is explicit: no copyrighted music on any Hammer piece. Room tone only.
  • One outfit for the Hammer batch. These land on the same person 15+ times in three days, and continuity is what makes it read as a library rather than a pile.
Ad creative · the call funnel's own
Read this first: until now the call funnel had no ads. Every angle in the webinar pack ends on "save your seat" and "one cohort a month", so pointing that traffic at /vsl breaks on the first click. These seven angles sell the audit call and nothing else. Built on SOP-26/27 (hook, reasons, one CTA), SOP-20 hook styles, and the CPO spine in the framework.
How to shoot it: film all 21 hooks first, back to back, in one setup. SOP-27's rapid hook test is 2 to 3 hooks against the same body, so the hooks are the variable and the bodies are the constant. Get them all in the can before energy drops, it matters more than perfect delivery on any one. Then the 14 bodies. Supply everything to Dynamic Creative and let the platform mix, do not hand-pick combinations up front.
Where to start spend: the in-market 3 to 4 percent who already believe the category matters are angles 1, 3 and 5. Fund those first, then widen to 2, 4, 6 and 7 once cost per application is known. Split stays 50/50 short and long, which seven 30s and seven 60s gives you exactly.

1 · The named competitor

Envy

The strongest angle we have, because it is checkable in ten seconds and the answer is usually bad. Envy beats fear here: an abstract threat is easy to defer, a specific rival being recommended is not.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

PainThere's a business in your market that AI keeps recommending. Statistically, it isn't you.

QuestionAsk ChatGPT to recommend a company that does what you do. Whose name comes up?

Bold claimI'll tell you for free exactly which competitor the AI engines are naming instead of you.

Video script30s
0-4s

There's a business in your market that AI keeps recommending. It probably isn't you.

Harry to camera, tight crop, flat

4-12s

When a buyer asks ChatGPT who to use, it names two or three companies. Not ten links. Two or three. And you have no way of seeing whether you're one of them.

slight lean in

12-24s

So we'll show you, free. We pull the actual AI answers for your category, grade your site against the framework we use for QuickBooks and Weber, and hand you the three moves that close the gap.

over-shoulder: citation check on screen

24-30s

Thirty minutes, and the plan is yours either way. Apply below.

back to camera, point down at CTA

Video script60s
0-5s

Ask ChatGPT to recommend a company that does what you do. Go on. Whose name comes up?

Harry to camera, cold open, no music

5-16s

Because it will name someone. Two or three businesses, confidently, like a friend would. And whoever gets named is taking meetings you never even heard about.

hold eye contact, let it sit

16-27s

I know how much this matters because it happened to us in reverse. Samsung found my agency through a ChatGPT recommendation. No ad, no referral. A machine vouched for us and they called.

b-roll: ChatGPT answer on screen

27-40s

So here's the offer. We'll pull the AI citations for your category free, grade your site against the six-part framework my team uses for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, and show you the three moves that close the biggest gap first.

screen share: scorecard being filled in

40-50s

Why free? Because some of the businesses we audit end up wanting us to run the plan. That's the whole mechanic. If it makes more sense for you to run it yourself, we'll say so on the call.

back to camera, plain and unhurried

50-60s

Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team, and you keep the plan whether you hire us or not. Businesses doing a million or more, apply below. Sixty seconds.

point at CTA, hold, cut to end card

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • Which Competitor Is AI Recommending?
  • Find Out Who AI Names Instead Of You
  • Your Category Already Has An AI Favorite
  • Free: Your AI Search Citation Gap

Primary text

  • When a buyer asks ChatGPT who to use in your category, it names two or three businesses. We'll pull the actual answers for your market, free, and show you who is being named instead of you. Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team. For businesses doing $1M+.
  • Most owners have never seen the answers their buyers are getting. We have. Our teams run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, and we'll pull the AI citations for your category free, then walk you through where you sit and the three moves that close the biggest gap. Thirty minutes, no deck, and you keep the plan whether you work with us or not. Apply below, it takes about sixty seconds.

2 · The channel you cannot see

Fear

Straight from the CPO problem line: they have no measurement, so they cannot tell working from being replaced. This angle sells the measurement itself, which is the honest core of the offer.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

PainYou can measure every channel in your business except the one that's replacing them.

QuestionWhat do the AI engines say about your business? Genuine question. Do you actually know?

Bold claimYour analytics cannot see the conversation that decides who your buyers call.

Video script30s
0-4s

You can measure every channel in your business except the one that's quietly replacing them.

Harry to camera, plain background, deadpan

4-13s

You know your cost per lead. You know your rankings. You have no idea what ChatGPT says when a buyer asks who to use in your category.

counting on fingers, then a shrug

13-24s

We'll measure it for you. Free. Where the engines cite your competitors, how your site scores against our six-part framework, and the three moves that close the gap.

over-shoulder: scorecard on screen

24-30s

Thirty minutes, plan's yours either way. Apply below.

to camera, point down

Video script60s
0-5s

What do the AI engines say about your business? Genuine question. Do you actually know?

Harry to camera, tight frame, a real question not a rhetorical one

5-16s

Most owners can't answer it, and that's the whole problem. Not that you're behind, but that you have no instrument. You can't tell the difference between your SEO working and your SEO being replaced.

steady, unhurried

16-28s

And by the time it shows up as a traffic drop in a monthly report, it's already happened. The report is a trailing indicator of a decision made months earlier.

slow, let the point land

28-42s

So we built the instrument. We pull where the answer engines cite your competitors instead of you, grade your site against the six-part framework my team runs for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, and give you the three moves in priority order.

screen share of the grading sheet

42-52s

It costs nothing, because some of the businesses we audit want us to run the plan. That's how the agency grows. If you're better off running it yourself, we'll tell you that on the call.

back to camera, matter of fact

52-60s

Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team. Businesses doing a million or more, apply below. It takes about a minute.

point at CTA, cut

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • The Channel Your Analytics Can't See
  • You Can't Fix What You Can't Measure
  • Get Your AI Search Visibility Graded, Free
  • What Do The Answer Engines Say About You?

Primary text

  • You know your cost per lead, your conversion rate and your rankings. You have no idea what ChatGPT tells a buyer who asks for a recommendation in your category. We'll measure it for you, free, and show you what to do about it. For businesses doing $1M+.
  • Traffic flat and nobody can tell you why? There's a good chance the answer is not in your reports at all. The answer engines recommend two or three businesses per query and nothing in your analytics captures whether you're one of them. We'll pull it, grade your site against the framework we use for QuickBooks and Weber, and give you a 90-day plan on a thirty-minute call. Free, and you keep the plan.

3 · The second opinion

Frustration

Aimed at the biggest real segment: they already have an agency. Deliberately not a pitch to fire anyone, which is the trap. A free second opinion is an easy yes and it is also the honest description of what the call is.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

PainYou've been getting an SEO report every month. Can you name one thing it changed?

Objection-firstI'm not going to tell you to fire your SEO agency. I'm going to give you a way to check on them.

QuestionIf your agency is doing a good job, a second opinion costs you nothing. So why not have one?

Video script30s
0-5s

I'm not going to tell you to fire your SEO agency. I'm going to give you a way to check on them.

Harry to camera, half smile, dry

5-14s

Because you can't really judge the work, can you. That's the expertise you hired them for. So you read the monthly report and hope.

shrug, no judgment in the delivery

14-25s

We'll give you an independent read, free. Your score against the framework we use for QuickBooks and Weber, and where AI is naming competitors instead of you. Take it straight to your agency.

over-shoulder: scorecard

25-30s

Thirty minutes, no switching. Apply below.

to camera, point down

Video script60s
0-5s

You've been getting an SEO report every month. Can you name one thing it actually changed?

Harry to camera, plain, genuinely asking

5-16s

If you can, brilliant, your agency is doing its job and this will confirm it. If you can't, that's worth thirty minutes of your time to find out about.

even-handed, not smug

16-28s

And there's a specific reason to check right now. AI search is the part most agencies haven't caught up on. Answer engines recommend two or three businesses per query, and getting cited works differently to ranking.

b-roll: AI answer naming businesses

28-40s

So we'll give you an independent read for free. Your score against the six-part framework we use for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, where AI cites competitors instead of you, and the three moves that matter most.

screen share of the grading sheet

40-50s

You can hand every bit of it to your current agency that same afternoon. No switching, no lock-in, and I mean that. If you'd rather we ran it, we'll talk. If not, you're still ahead.

open hands, back to camera

50-60s

Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team. Businesses doing a million or more, apply below.

point at CTA, cut to end card

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • A Free Second Opinion On Your SEO
  • Is Your Agency Ready For AI Search?
  • Reports You Can't Act On Aren't Results
  • Check On Your SEO, Free, No Switching

Primary text

  • You're paying for SEO every month. Do you know whether any of it is preparing you for AI search? We'll give you an independent read for free. Thirty minutes, no switching required, you keep the findings. For businesses doing $1M+.
  • This is not a pitch to fire your agency. Plenty of them are good, and the ones that are will look good in this. We'll grade your site against the six-part framework we use for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, pull where AI engines cite competitors instead of you, and hand you the three moves that matter most. Free, and the findings are yours to take straight to whoever runs your search today.

4 · Samsung found us through ChatGPT

Bold claim

Our single strongest proof asset, and it does double duty: it establishes credibility and it demonstrates that the mechanism we are selling actually produces clients. Carry it into the call funnel intact.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Bold claimSamsung found my agency through a ChatGPT recommendation. Not an ad. Not a referral.

QuestionWhat would it be worth if the biggest company in your category called you first, having never seen an ad?

PainThe best lead I got last year cost me nothing, and most business owners have no route to one.

Video script30s
0-5s

Samsung found my agency through ChatGPT. Not an ad. Not a referral. An AI recommended us and they called.

Harry to camera, flat, pause after ChatGPT

5-13s

That's the position you actually want. Not chasing clients. Being the name that comes up when someone asks.

lean in slightly

13-24s

So we'll check whether it can happen in your category. Free. Your score against our six-part framework, your citation gap, and the three moves that close it.

over-shoulder: citation check

24-30s

Thirty minutes, plan's yours either way. Apply below.

point down at CTA

Video script60s
0-5s

One of the biggest companies in the world found my agency without ever seeing an ad. They just asked ChatGPT.

Harry to camera, cold open, no music

5-15s

It was Samsung. They wanted an SEO partner, they asked, and it recommended StudioHawk. They arrived already convinced, because a machine they trust vouched for us.

Samsung as plain on-screen text, small dry smile

15-26s

And that's not luck. It happens because of how a site is built, what it publishes, and whether the engines can read and trust it. It's a method, and it's the one my team runs for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.

slower on it's a method

26-40s

So here's what I'll do. We'll grade your site against that same six-part framework, free, pull where the engines cite competitors instead of you, and give you the three moves that close the biggest gap first.

screen share: scorecard filling in

40-50s

Why would we do that for nothing? Because a fair number of the businesses we audit ask us to run the plan. That's the mechanic, and there isn't a catch under it.

back to camera, straight

50-60s

Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team, and you keep the plan whether you hire us or not. Businesses past a million, apply below.

point at CTA, hold eye contact, cut

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • Samsung Found Us Through ChatGPT
  • Be The Recommendation, Not The Ad
  • The Lead That Cost Us Nothing
  • How To Get Recommended By AI

Primary text

  • Samsung didn't find StudioHawk through an ad. They asked ChatGPT for a recommendation and it named us. We'll show you, free, whether the same thing could happen in your category and exactly what stands in the way. For businesses doing $1M+.
  • Ads chase clients. Recommendations bring them to you. When Samsung asked ChatGPT who to work with, it named my agency, and that happened for reasons I can walk you through in thirty minutes. We'll grade your site against the same six-part framework, pull your citation gap, and give you the three moves. Free, and you keep the plan.

5 · Traffic went flat and nobody can say why

Frustration

The literal circumstances line from the CPO spine, said back to them in their own words. Highest intent for the in-market 3 to 4 percent, because it describes a problem they are actively carrying rather than one we have to introduce.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

PainYour traffic went flat about a year ago and nobody has given you a straight answer about why.

Bold claimIf your organic traffic plateaued and your rankings didn't, I can probably tell you what happened.

QuestionRankings holding, traffic falling. Has anyone actually explained that to you?

Video script30s
0-5s

Your traffic went flat about a year ago and nobody has given you a straight answer about why.

Harry to camera, tight crop, plain

5-14s

Here's the usual answer. Your rankings are fine. The click just isn't happening, because the engine answers the question and names two or three businesses instead.

b-roll: AI answer resolving a query

14-25s

We'll find out whether that's what's happening to you. Free. Where AI names competitors instead of you, your score against our framework, the three moves that fix it.

over-shoulder: scorecard

25-30s

Thirty minutes. Apply below.

to camera, point down

Video script60s
0-5s

Rankings holding, traffic falling. Has anyone actually explained that to you?

Harry to camera, genuine question

5-16s

Because it's the most common thing I hear from established businesses right now. The report says everything is fine. The numbers say otherwise. And the two never get reconciled.

steady, slightly wry

16-30s

Usually the answer is this. Your ranking is intact, but the click is being resolved before it gets to you. The engine answers the question on the page and recommends two or three businesses. If you're not one of them, that ranking is worth a fraction of what it was.

b-roll: AI overview answering, then a plain results page for contrast

30-43s

So we'll diagnose it for you, free. Where the engines cite competitors instead of you, how your site scores against the six-part framework we run for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, and the three moves in priority order.

screen share of the grading sheet

43-52s

No charge, because some of the businesses we audit want us to run the plan. If yours is a job you can do in-house, we'll tell you that instead.

back to camera, unhurried

52-60s

Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team, and the plan is yours either way. Businesses past a million, apply below.

point at CTA, cut

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • Rankings Fine, Traffic Falling?
  • The Straight Answer On Your Flat Traffic
  • Why Good Rankings Stopped Paying
  • Find Out What Changed. Free.

Primary text

  • Rankings holding, traffic sliding, and nobody can tell you why. There is usually a specific answer to that and it is usually AI. We'll find it for you free, in thirty minutes. For businesses doing $1M+.
  • If your rankings are steady but the traffic keeps thinning, you are not imagining it and it is not your campaigns. Answer engines are resolving more searches without a click, and they recommend two or three businesses when they do. We'll show you exactly where that is happening in your category, grade your site against our six-part framework, and give you the three moves that matter. Free, and the plan is yours.

6 · The scorecard

Specific question

Mechanism-forward. Some buyers are moved by a threat and some by an instrument, and this one sells the artifact: a score, a gap, a ranked list. Deliberately the least emotional angle in the set so the pack does not become one note.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

QuestionSix things decide whether AI recommends your business. How many of them is your site doing?

Bold claimWe can score your website on AI search readiness out of six, and tell you which one to fix first.

Objection-firstYou don't need another audit PDF. You need a score, a gap and a ranked list of three things.

Video script30s
0-5s

Six things decide whether AI recommends your business. How many of them is your site actually doing?

Harry to camera, straight question

5-14s

Most owners don't know, because nobody's ever scored it. And a sixty-page audit isn't a score, it's homework.

dry on homework

14-25s

So we'll score you out of six, free, show you where AI names competitors instead of you, and tell you which one to fix first.

over-shoulder: six-signal scorecard filling in

25-30s

Thirty minutes, scorecard's yours. Apply below.

point down at CTA

Video script60s
0-5s

You don't need another audit PDF. You need a score, a gap, and three things to do about it.

Harry to camera, plain background

5-16s

Every big audit I've ever seen a business receive had the same flaw. Comprehensive. Four hundred issues, no opinion about which one matters, so nothing happens.

slight shrug, been-there delivery

16-30s

So we do it the other way. Six signals that decide whether the answer engines can read you, trust you and recommend you. You get a score on each, and the live citations showing who's being named instead of you.

screen share: scorecard, then a citation list

30-42s

Then the useful part. We tell you which single thing to fix first, and why that one. It's the same framework my team runs for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.

back to camera

42-52s

It's free because some of the businesses we score end up wanting us to do the work. If yours is something your own team can handle, we'll say so, and you'll still have the scorecard.

open, unhurried

52-60s

Thirty minutes with a senior member of my team. Businesses past a million, apply below. Sixty seconds.

point at CTA, cut to end card

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • Score Your Site On AI Search, Free
  • Six Signals. How Many Do You Have?
  • A Score And Three Moves, Not A PDF
  • Get Graded Against Our Framework

Primary text

  • Six signals decide whether the answer engines recommend a business. We'll score your site on all six, free, and tell you which one to fix first. Thirty minutes, and you keep the scorecard. For businesses doing $1M+.
  • Not another sixty-page audit nobody reads. A score against six specific signals, the exact places AI cites your competitors instead of you, and three moves in priority order. It's the same framework my team runs for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. Free, and the scorecard is yours whether you hire us or not.

7 · Why would an agency do this for free?

Objection-first

SOP-26 lists objection-first as a hook style in its own right, and for a free high-value offer it is the objection. Leading with it converts the suspicious reader instead of losing them silently, and it is the most honest ad in the pack.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Objection-firstWhy would an SEO agency audit your site for free? Let me just tell you.

Bold claimThere's no catch, and I'll explain the business model in about ten seconds.

QuestionWhat's the catch on a free audit from an agency that runs search for QuickBooks and Weber?

Video script30s
0-5s

Why would an SEO agency audit your site for free? Let me just tell you.

Harry to camera, direct, no preamble

5-14s

Because a fair number of the businesses we audit end up asking us to run the plan. That's the whole model. No catch under it.

open hands, plain delivery

14-25s

You get a score against six signals, the citations showing who AI names instead of you, and three moves. Thirty minutes. Yours whether you hire us or not.

over-shoulder: scorecard

25-30s

Businesses past a million. Apply below.

point down at CTA

Video script60s
0-5s

If you saw free audit from an SEO agency and thought what's the catch, good. That instinct has served you well.

Harry to camera, half smile

5-16s

So I'll just answer it. It's free because a fair number of the businesses we audit end up asking us to run the plan afterwards. That's how the agency grows. That's the whole model.

matter of fact, no defensiveness

16-30s

What you actually get: a score against six signals that decide whether the answer engines recommend you, the live citations showing which competitors get named instead of you, and the three moves that close the biggest gap first.

screen share: scorecard, citation list

30-42s

And what you won't get: a countdown timer, a fake deadline, or a pitch if a pitch doesn't fit. If what you need is something your own team can handle, we'll say so on the call and you'll still walk away with the plan.

back to camera, steady

42-52s

I'm Harry Sanders. I founded StudioHawk, we run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, best large SEO agency seven times, 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews.

b-roll: office, awards, quick and unfussy

52-60s

We put senior people on these calls, which is the only reason there's an application. Sixty seconds, eight questions. Businesses past a million, apply below.

point at CTA, hold, cut

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • Why We Audit For Free (Honestly)
  • No Catch. Here's The Business Model.
  • A Free Audit, And Why That Makes Sense
  • The Honest Reason This Costs Nothing

Primary text

  • Why free? Because a fair number of the businesses we audit end up asking us to run the plan. That's the entire mechanic. You get a scorecard, a citation gap and three moves in thirty minutes, and you keep them either way. For businesses doing $1M+.
  • Fair question: why would an agency that runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh grade your site for nothing? Because some of the businesses we audit want us to run the plan afterwards, and that's how we grow. No pressure mechanics, no countdown timers, and if the plan is something your own team should do we'll say so on the call. Thirty minutes, you keep the plan.
Angles 8 and up come from the SOP-31 Dog Food exercise: every distinct reason a $1M+ owner would say yes, written as its own cohesive unit rather than as a variation. Each was checked against the seven above, and against its siblings, for a genuinely different reason to buy rather than different wording.

8 · The Sylvane Number

Transformation

Reason to buy: There is a measurable, reachable upside at this business size. AI recommendation is not weather, it is a number, and Sylvane, an ordinary Atlanta retailer, moved theirs 621 percent on purpose. The reason to buy is the size of the available gain, not the size of the threat.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Stat OpenAn Atlanta retailer grew their brand mentions inside AI models by 621 percent. They are not a household name. That is the whole point.

Specific QuestionIf the number of times AI names your brand could go up 621 percent, would you want to know what it is today?

Objection-FirstYou are probably waiting to see how AI search settles. Sylvane did not wait. Their brand mentions inside AI models are up 621 percent.

Video script30s
0:00-0:05

There is a retailer in Atlanta called Sylvane. You have probably not heard of them.

Cold open. Harry to camera, mid shot, office studio. Flat delivery, no smile, no windup. No overlay at all on this beat.

0:05-0:09

Their brand mentions inside AI models are up 621 percent.

Cut to punch-in at 125%. Overlay stamps 621% large and central on the number, then drops. Hold one beat of silence after.

0:09-0:14

That is not the models deciding they like them. Somebody worked on it on purpose.

Back to mid shot. Small shrug on the second sentence. Matter of fact, like he is correcting a misunderstanding, not selling.

0:14-0:19

Which means it is a number. And a number you can see is a number you can move.

Slow push in. B-roll insert for 2 seconds: dark background, a simple counter graphic ticking upward beside one brand name. Cyan accent, no stock footage, no faces.

0:19-0:27

So, a free thirty minute call. We grade your site, show you where AI is naming a competitor, and give you the three moves that matter.

Back to Harry, direct eye contact held through the whole line. Hands resting, counting nothing. Overlays flash three short beats: SCORE, GAP, THREE MOVES.

0:27-0:30

Yours to keep either way. Apply below.

Hold the look, no smile until the last half second. Hard cut to end card, apply URL and StudioHawk logo. No music sting, let it end dry.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • 621% more brand mentions inside AI answers
  • Sylvane is not a household name. AI names them anyway.
  • AI recommendation is a number, and numbers move
  • Find out how much higher your number goes

Primary text

  • Sylvane is a retailer in Atlanta. Not a household name. Their brand mentions inside AI models are up 621 percent. That did not happen because the models developed a preference. Somebody did the work deliberately, in the places the models read. Which means this is not weather. It is a number, and the number responds to work. Before the call we grade your site against SOURC-E and pull where AI engines cite a competitor instead of you. Then 30 minutes with a senior member of our team on your score, the gap, and the three moves that close the most ground first. You keep the plan whether you hire us or not. Applying takes about 60 seconds, 8 questions.
  • Sylvane is a retailer in Atlanta. Not a household name. Their brand mentions inside AI models are up 621 percent. That did not happen because the models developed a preference for them. It happened because the work was done deliberately, in the places the models read. Here is what that means for a business over $1M in revenue. AI recommendation is not weather. It is a number, and the number responds to effort applied in the right order. So there is a version of your business where that number is materially higher than it is today, and it is reachable with ordinary work. So we start you with the number. Before the call we grade your site against SOURC-E, the six-part framework Harry wrote the book on, and pull the places AI engines currently cite a competitor in your category. Then a senior member of our team spends 30 minutes with you on the scorecard, the citation gap, and the three moves that close the biggest part of it first. You keep the plan whether you hire us or not. StudioHawk has 120+ specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta, and runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. Applying takes about 60 seconds. 8 questions. We review every application, and the ones that fit book straight onto the calendar.

9 · The Early Call

Identity

Reason to buy: Position economics for the operator who gets in before a channel gets expensive. The buyer's identity is built on having been early to every channel that ever paid off, and the only honest urgency is that citation position compounds, so buying it back off a competitor later costs more than winning it now.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Bold ClaimEvery channel that ever made you money, you were early to. This one is still early.

Specific QuestionIn three years, when someone at your company asks who called AI search first, do you want that answer to be you?

Objection-FirstYou do not have to believe AI replaces Google. You only have to believe that being the brand it names is cheaper to win now than to buy back off someone later.

Video script30s
0:00-0:05

Think about the channel that made you the most money. You were early to it.

Harry seated, office studio, leaning slightly forward. Conversational, like he is picking up a conversation already in progress. No overlay on the open.

0:05-0:10

Not because you were clever. Because you got in before the position got expensive.

Small dry half smile on 'not because you were clever'. Cut to a tighter frame on the second half. This line earns the trust, do not rush it.

0:10-0:16

AI search is at that point now. The engines are working out who they name in your category.

B-roll insert, 3 seconds: dark screen, a question typed, an answer resolving with one brand name inside it. Cyan accent. Editorial, not flashy.

0:16-0:22

Once a competitor is the one being cited, you are not catching up. You are buying it back.

Back to Harry, direct to camera, delivery slows here. This is the whole argument. Hold on his face, no cut, let half a second of silence sit after it.

0:22-0:28

So find out where you stand. Thirty minutes with someone senior here, your site graded against SOURC-E.

Push in to 150%. Overlay: FREE 30 MINUTE CALL. Then a second overlay: YOUR SCORE OUT OF SIX.

0:28-0:30

Apply below. Eight questions.

Flat close, no upsell energy. Hard cut to end card with apply URL. Music drops out entirely on the final line.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • Be the one who called it early
  • Being named second costs more than being named first
  • You were early to every channel that worked
  • Early is a position, and it is still available

Primary text

  • Every channel that ever worked for you, you were early to. Not first in the world. Just early enough that the position was still cheap. AI search is at that point now. The engines are settling on who they name in your category, and those positions compound. Once a competitor holds the answer, you are not catching up, you are buying it back off someone who already has it. That is the whole urgency argument. There is no countdown on this. Free 30 minute call with a senior member of our team. We grade your site against SOURC-E first, then walk you through where you stand and the three moves that close the most ground. Apply in 60 seconds, 8 questions.
  • Every channel that ever worked for you, you were early to. Not first in the world. Just early enough that the position was still cheap. AI search is at that point now. The engines are deciding who they name for the questions your buyers ask, and those positions are sticky. Being the brand that gets cited compounds. So does being the brand that does not, because once a competitor holds the answer, you are no longer catching up. You are buying it back off someone who already has it. That is the whole urgency argument and it is the only honest one. There is no countdown here and nobody is closing a door on you. What we will do is tell you where you actually stand. Before the call we grade your site against SOURC-E, the six-part framework Harry wrote the book on, and pull where AI engines currently cite a competitor instead of you. Then 30 minutes with a senior member of our team on the score, the citation gap, and the three moves that close the most ground first. The plan is yours either way, hire us or not. StudioHawk runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, with 120+ specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta. Apply in about 60 seconds. 8 questions. We review every application and the ones that fit book straight onto the calendar.

10 · The Room You Walk Into

Identity

Reason to buy: Professional standing in the accountability moment. Somebody senior is going to ask this person where the business stands on AI search, and they want to answer with a number and a ranked list instead of admitting they do not know. The purchase buys their credibility in that room.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Pain/ProblemSomebody is going to ask you where you stand on AI search. Probably this quarter. What is the answer?

Story OpenThe bad version of that meeting is the one where you say you are keeping an eye on it, and everyone quietly decides you do not know.

Specific QuestionWhen your board asks about AI search, do you want to give them an opinion or a number?

Video script30s
0:00-0:05

At some point your boss or your board is going to ask where you stand on AI search.

Open on Harry mid frame, standing, office studio, arms relaxed. He states it like a fact of life, not a threat. No overlay, no music yet.

0:05-0:09

And 'we are keeping an eye on it' sounds exactly like it sounds.

Dry beat. Slight tilt of the head. Cut on the line. Overlay in small type only: WE ARE KEEPING AN EYE ON IT, then it deletes itself character by character.

0:09-0:15

You do not need a strategy for that meeting. You need a number and a short list.

Music enters low here. Push in to medium close. Hands come up, two fingers, marking the two things. Slow, not animated.

0:15-0:21

So before we speak we grade your site, and pull where AI is naming a competitor instead of you.

B-roll insert, 3 seconds: clean scorecard graphic on dark background, a score resolving with three ranked rows underneath. Sparse, editorial, cyan accent only.

0:21-0:28

Then thirty minutes with someone senior here, and you walk out with the score and the three moves.

Back to Harry, direct camera, steady. Overlay: 30 MINUTES. SENIOR TEAM. Then clears.

0:28-0:30

It is yours either way. Apply below.

Flat, unhurried. Hard cut to end card, apply URL and logo. No smile here, the ad works better if he never sells it.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • What do you say when they ask about AI search?
  • "We are looking into it" is not an answer
  • Walk into that meeting with a number
  • Be the one who already checked

Primary text

  • Sooner or later somebody asks you the question. The owner, the board, whoever signs off the marketing budget. Where are we on AI search? There are two versions of that meeting. In one you say you are keeping an eye on it. In the other you put a number on the table and a short list of what you are doing about it. The second one takes 30 minutes to prepare for. We grade your site against SOURC-E before we speak, pull where AI engines name a competitor instead of you, and a senior member of our team walks you through it. You keep it either way. Apply in 60 seconds, 8 questions.
  • Sooner or later somebody is going to ask you the question. The owner, the board, the person who signs off the marketing budget. Where are we on AI search? There are two versions of that meeting. In the first one you say you are keeping an eye on it, and everyone in the room quietly decides you do not know. That is not unfair of them. It is the correct read. In the second one you put something on the table. Here is our score. Here is where the engines are naming a competitor instead of us. Here are the three things we are doing about it, in order, biggest gap first. The second meeting takes 30 minutes to prepare for. Before the call we grade your site against SOURC-E, the six-part framework Harry wrote the book on, and pull where AI engines currently recommend someone else in your category. On the call a senior member of our team takes you through all of it, plainly, with no pitch deck. You keep the plan whether you hire us or not. StudioHawk runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, with 120+ specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta, and 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. Apply in about 60 seconds. 8 questions. We read every application.

11 · 272 Strangers

Social Proof

Reason to buy: Who is doing the grading. Before you let anyone assess your search, you can verify them in public: 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews, named best large SEO agency seven times, and QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh on the client list. The audit is only worth as much as the people reading it.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Stat Open272 Google reviews. 4.9 stars. Go and read them before you talk to us, that is fine by me.

Specific QuestionWould you let an agency you had never heard of grade your search? Neither would I. So here is the receipt first.

Objection-FirstAnyone can offer you a free audit. The only question worth asking is who is doing the grading.

Video script30s
0:00-0:05

Before you take a free audit from anybody, including us, go and check them.

Harry to camera, seated, office studio. Says it like advice, not a pitch. Hands still. No overlay for the first three seconds.

0:05-0:10

Ours is all public. Four point nine stars, two hundred and seventy two Google reviews.

Cut to punch-in. Overlay stamps 4.9 and 272 REVIEWS as two separate hits, one per number. Sharp SFX on each stamp, nothing cartoonish.

0:10-0:16

Best large SEO agency, seven times. A hundred and twenty specialists in Melbourne, London and Atlanta.

B-roll insert, 3 seconds: three city names appearing on a dark map graphic with cyan markers. Plain and editorial. Cut back on the last word.

0:16-0:21

We run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.

Back to Harry, direct camera. Client names appear as clean text only, no logos unless cleared for use. He undersells it deliberately.

0:21-0:27

Then take the call. Thirty minutes, someone senior, and where the engines are naming a competitor instead of you.

Slow push in to 150%. Overlays flash: YOUR SCORE, CITATION GAP, THREE MOVES.

0:27-0:30

You keep the plan either way. Apply below.

Hold the look one beat past comfortable, then hard cut to end card with apply URL. Music out before the final sentence.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • 4.9 stars. 272 reviews. Go read them.
  • Named best large SEO agency seven times
  • We run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh
  • Check the reviews first. Then apply.

Primary text

  • Anyone can offer you a free audit. The only question worth asking is who is doing the grading. So check us first. 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. Named best large SEO agency seven times. 120+ specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta. We run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. Then take the call. We grade your site against SOURC-E beforehand, pull where AI engines cite a competitor instead of you, and a senior member of our team walks you through the three moves that close the biggest gap. Yours to keep either way. Apply in 60 seconds, 8 questions.
  • Anyone can offer you a free audit. The only question worth asking is who is doing the grading. So check us before you check anything else. 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. Named best large SEO agency seven times. 120+ specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta. We run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. Harry founded the business at 17, which is either a good story or a long track record depending on how you want to look at it. Then take the call. Before it, we grade your site against SOURC-E, the six-part framework Harry wrote the book on, and pull the places AI engines currently cite a competitor in your category instead of you. On the call, 30 minutes with a senior member of our team going through the scorecard, the citation gap, and the three moves that close the biggest gap first. You keep the plan whether you hire us or not. Applying takes about 60 seconds. 8 questions. We review every application and the ones that fit book straight onto the calendar.

12 · The Shortlist Happens Without You

Problem Agitation

Reason to buy: REPLACEMENT for the previous fifth angle. The buying journey now produces a shortlist before anyone contacts you, so the loss never appears in your pipeline as a lost deal. Owners misdiagnose the symptom as a sales problem or a soft market when it is a citation problem happening upstream of the pipeline. No existing angle touches the sales and pipeline misdiagnosis.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Pain/ProblemThe deals you never hear about are not lost in sales. They are lost before anyone types your name.

Story OpenSomebody in your category asked a machine who to use this morning. It gave them three names. You were on that list or you were not, and nobody tells you which.

Objection-FirstYou cannot lose a deal you were never shortlisted for. That is exactly what makes this expensive, and why it never shows up in your numbers as a loss.

Video script30s
0:00-0:05

This morning, someone in your category asked a machine who they should use.

Harry to camera, seated, office studio. Quiet open, almost conversational. No overlay, no music for the first beat.

0:05-0:10

It gave them three names. You were one of them, or you were not.

Cut to tighter frame. B-roll insert for 2 seconds: dark screen, an answer resolving with three brand names, one dimmed. No faces, no stock footage.

0:10-0:16

Nobody tells you which. It never shows up as a lost deal, because you never got to the deal.

Back to Harry. Delivery flat and unhurried, he is stating a mechanic, not warning anyone. Let the second sentence land with no cut.

0:16-0:21

It shows up as a quiet quarter, and everyone blames the market.

Slow push in. Overlay in small type: NOT A SALES PROBLEM. Holds two seconds, then clears.

0:21-0:27

Free thirty minute call. We grade your site and show you where the engines name a competitor instead of you.

Direct to camera, eye contact held to the end. Overlays flash: YOUR SCORE, CITATION GAP, THREE MOVES.

0:27-0:30

Yours to keep either way. Apply below.

Dry close, half a beat of silence, then hard cut to end card with apply URL and logo. Music out before the last line.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • The shortlist forms before anyone contacts you
  • You cannot lose a deal you were never on the list for
  • Nobody tells you when you got left out
  • It looks like a soft market. It is a citation problem.

Primary text

  • Somebody in your category asked a machine who to use this morning. It gave them three names. You were on that list or you were not, and nobody tells you which. That is what makes this expensive. It never shows up as a lost deal, because you never got to the deal. It shows up as a quieter quarter, fewer inbound conversations, and a sales team saying the market feels harder. So find out. Before the call we grade your site against SOURC-E and pull where AI engines recommend a competitor instead of you. Then 30 minutes with a senior member of our team on the score, the gap, and the three moves that close the most ground. Yours to keep either way. Apply in 60 seconds, 8 questions.
  • Somebody in your category asked a machine who to use this morning. It gave them three names. You were on that list or you were not, and either way nobody tells you. This is the part that makes it expensive. It does not arrive as a lost deal, because you never got to the deal. It arrives as a quieter quarter. Fewer inbound conversations. A sales team saying the market feels harder than it did. An owner asking why the pipeline is thinner when nothing obvious has changed. So it gets diagnosed as a sales problem, or a market problem, or a bad run. It is neither. The shortlist is now being written upstream of your pipeline, by something you have never audited. Worth knowing where you sit on it. Before the call we grade your site against SOURC-E, the six-part framework Harry wrote the book on, and pull where AI engines currently recommend a competitor instead of you. Then 30 minutes with a senior member of our team on the score, the citation gap, and the three moves that close the biggest gap first. The plan is yours whether you hire us or not. StudioHawk runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, with 120+ specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta and 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. Apply in about 60 seconds. 8 questions. We read every application and the ones that fit book straight onto the calendar.

13 · Who Actually Reads Your Site

Social Proof

Reason to buy: The reason to take the call is whose judgment you get for 30 minutes. The team that runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh reads your business and tells you what it sees, so the value is the caliber of the read, not the document at the end of it.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Verbal hook, bold statementThe team that runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh will spend thirty minutes on your site. You do not pay for it.

Text hook, intriguing questionBefore you take any free audit, ask one question: who is actually going to look?

Visual hook, pre-loaded object openHarry drops a stack of printed site audits onto the desk as the frame opens, already reaching for the top one. He pulls it off the pile, turns it toward the lens, and it stays there while he talks.

Video script30s
0:00-0:04

Before you take any free audit, ask who is actually going to look at it.

Harry drops a stack of printed audits onto the desk as the frame opens, hand already moving to the top one. Motion in frame one. Text hook: WHO IS ACTUALLY LOOKING.

0:04-0:09

Normally? A tool nobody supervised, and a kid reading it back to you.

He slides the top report toward the lens, then lets it drop flat. Dry delivery, no smile. Punch in slightly on the discarded page.

0:09-0:15

With this one you get someone senior from the team that runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.

Cut to static medium on Harry, hands still. Lower third card holds the three client names for the full line so they can be read.

0:15-0:20

Best large SEO agency seven times. Four point nine stars, two hundred and seventy two reviews.

Cut to a clean stat card, one figure per beat, stair stepping in. No music swell, keep the bed flat under him.

0:20-0:26

Thirty minutes. We grade you on six things and show you who the engines name instead.

Cut to scorecard graphic, six criteria, score revealed, then the citation list. Blur any real client identifier.

0:26-0:30

It costs nothing and you keep the plan. Apply below, eight questions.

Medium on Harry, direct to lens, hands still. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, 8 QUESTIONS, 60 SECONDS. Hard cut on the last word, no black tail.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • The team behind QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh will read your site.
  • Named best large SEO agency seven times. Thirty minutes on your business, free.
  • You are not getting a junior and a template.
  • 4.9 stars from 272 reviews. Now point that team at your site.

Primary text

  • Most free audits are a tool running unattended and a junior reading the output back to you. This is not that. The free AI Search audit is 30 minutes with a senior member of the team that runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. 120 plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta. Named best large SEO agency seven times. Before we speak we grade your site against SOURC-E and pull where the engines cite a competitor instead of you. Apply in 60 seconds. You keep the plan whether you hire us or not.
  • Before you accept any free audit, ask one question. Who is actually going to look at it. Usually the answer is a tool running unattended and someone six months into the job reading the output back to you. That is why free audits have a reputation. Here is who looks at yours. A senior member of the team that runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. StudioHawk has 120 plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta and has been named best large SEO agency seven times. 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. Harry Sanders founded the business at 17, is Forbes 30 Under 30, has been featured in Forbes and on BBC World News, and wrote the book on the SOURC-E framework your site gets graded against. That is the whole pitch. Not a better PDF. A better set of eyes, pointed at your business, for half an hour. Before the call we grade your site against SOURC-E, six parts, and pull where AI engines are currently citing a competitor instead of you. On the call you get your score, the citation gap, and the three moves that close the biggest gap first. Built for businesses over $1M in revenue where search genuinely brings in customers. Applying takes about 60 seconds, 8 questions. We read every one, and if it fits it books straight onto the calendar. You keep the plan whether you hire us or not.

14 · How A Citation Actually Gets Won

Tactical

Reason to buy: Nobody has ever explained the mechanic that decides which company an answer engine names, so the buyer has no way to judge whether AI search is a real discipline with levers he can pull or an old SEO retainer with new words on the invoice.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Verbal hook, bold statementRanking first and getting recommended are two different mechanics. You have only ever been sold the first one.

Text hook, intriguing questionDo you actually know how an AI decides which company to name?

Visual hook, hands busy talkerHarry at a glass wall drawing two columns, marker already moving in frame one. He fills the first column completely, taps the second, and it stays empty for the rest of the ad.

Video script30s
0:00-0:04

Ranking first and getting recommended are two different jobs.

Tight on Harry at a glass wall, marker already drawing column one as the frame opens. Text hook: TWO DIFFERENT MECHANICS.

0:04-0:09

This one you have been paying for. This one nobody has explained.

Harry taps column one, then the empty column two. Hands busy on the glass throughout. Punch in on the blank column.

0:09-0:14

It does not rank you. It builds an answer out of how you get described.

Whip transition to motion graphic. Several source cards fly in and collapse into one answer block.

0:14-0:19

If those descriptions do not agree, or are not there, you do not get named.

Back to Harry, static medium, arms down, unhurried. Let the line land. One beat of silence before the cut.

0:19-0:25

So we grade you on six things, free, and show you which ones are missing.

Scorecard graphic, six criteria, two marked short. Stair step punch in on each of the two.

0:25-0:30

Thirty minutes with someone senior, then the three moves in order. Apply below.

Medium on Harry, direct to lens. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, APPLY IN 60 SECONDS. Cut hard, no black tail.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • Ranking first and getting recommended are two different mechanics.
  • Here is how an answer engine decides which company to name.
  • Nobody has shown you the lever. That is the actual problem.
  • Graded on six criteria, then three moves in priority order.

Primary text

  • An engine does not rank you. It assembles an answer out of how you are described across everything it trusts, then names whoever comes out cleanest. If those descriptions do not exist, or do not agree, you do not get named. That is the whole mechanic, and no one has walked you through it. The free AI Search audit grades your site against six criteria and shows you exactly which ones you are short on. 30 minutes with someone senior. Apply in 60 seconds. The plan is yours either way.
  • You have been buying rankings for years. Nobody has explained the other mechanic to you. An answer engine does not rank a list. It assembles an answer out of how a business is described across the sources it trusts, then names whoever comes out clearest and most corroborated. Your own website is one input. It is not the deciding one. So the levers are different. What you publish, in a form a machine can actually lift. What other sources say about you. Whether those two things agree. Miss any of it and you can hold every ranking you have and still never be named. That is what SOURC-E measures. Six parts, the framework Harry wrote the book on. The free AI Search audit runs it over your site before we speak, and pulls where the engines are currently citing a competitor instead of you. On the call, 30 minutes with a senior member of the team, you get your score out of six, the citation gap, and the three moves that close the biggest one first. Not a 60 page PDF. Three moves, in order. StudioHawk has 120 plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta, runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, and has been named best large SEO agency seven times. 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. For businesses over $1M in revenue. Applying takes 60 seconds, 8 questions, we read every one. You keep the plan whether you hire us or not.

15 · What The Machine Says About You

Curiosity

Reason to buy: An answer engine is already describing your business to buyers, unsupervised, assembled from sources you did not write and cannot see, and you have never once read the description it gives.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Verbal hook, curiosity gap statementThere is a paragraph about your business being read by buyers right now. You have never read it.

Text hook, bold statementAn AI is describing your company to your customers today. Unsupervised.

Visual hook, pre loaded object openHarry turns a monitor to face the lens. The answer on screen is deliberately out of focus. He rack focuses for one beat, then cuts before it is legible.

Video script30s
0:00-0:04

There is a paragraph about your business you have never read.

Harry rotates a monitor toward the lens. The rotation supplies the motion in frame one. Screen text deliberately soft. Text hook: YOU HAVE NOT READ THIS.

0:04-0:09

It is what the AI says when someone asks about you. Written by nobody. Assembled.

Rack focus so the answer sharpens for one beat, then cut before it is legible. Use a real audit screen with the client name blurred. Never a mocked up quote.

0:09-0:15

Might be right. Might be a service you stopped selling three years ago.

Cut to Harry seated, static medium, hands resting. Flat delivery, no eyebrow. Let it sit.

0:15-0:20

You approve every line on your website. You have never seen this one.

Slow push in to 150 percent across the line. Subtitles just below center, outside the UI safe zone.

0:20-0:26

We read it back to you on the call. Free. Thirty minutes. Plus your score.

Cut to scorecard graphic, six criteria, score revealed. Keep any real client detail blurred.

0:26-0:30

Someone senior, not a junior with a template. Apply below.

Medium on Harry, direct to lens, hands still. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, 8 QUESTIONS, 60 SECONDS. Hard cut on the last word.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • There is a paragraph about your business you have never read.
  • An AI is describing your company to buyers. Have you checked what it says?
  • You approve every line on your website. Not this one.
  • We will read you what the engines say about you. Free, 30 minutes.

Primary text

  • Somewhere today a buyer asked an AI about your business and got a paragraph back. You have never read that paragraph. It was written by nobody, assembled from sources you did not write, and it might be quoting a service you stopped selling. You approve every line on your site. This is the one line you have never seen. The free AI Search audit reads it back to you, with your score against SOURC-E and the three moves that fix what is wrong. 30 minutes, someone senior. Apply in 60 seconds.
  • You sign off on every line of your website. There is one description of your business you have never read. When a buyer asks an answer engine about your company, it returns a paragraph. Written by nobody. Assembled out of whatever sources it trusts, most of which you did not write and have never audited. It might be accurate. It might be quoting a service you stopped selling, a market you left, or somebody else's comparison of you. Whatever it says, it is being read by people deciding whether to call you, and no one on your team has ever checked it. The free AI Search audit starts there. Before your call we grade your site against SOURC-E, the six part framework Harry wrote the book on, and we pull the actual descriptions and citations the engines return for you and for your category. On the call, 30 minutes with a senior member of our team, we read it back to you. Your score, where a competitor is being named instead of you, and the three moves that close the biggest gap first. Harry Sanders founded StudioHawk at 17. Forbes 30 Under 30, featured in Forbes and on BBC World News. 120 plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta. 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. For businesses over $1M in revenue where search matters to how you get customers. 60 seconds to apply, 8 questions, we review every application. You keep the plan whether you hire us or not.

16 · You Are The Ingredient, Someone Else Is The Dish

Problem Agitation

Reason to buy: The content you already paid for is being read and used to build the answer while a different company gets named inside it, so your content budget is producing the recommendation and not the customer.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Verbal hook, bold statementYour content is getting read. It is just being used to recommend somebody else.

Text hook, sarcastic confessionFour years of content. Built a genuinely good answer for a competitor.

Visual hook, hands busy talkerOverhead on Harry plating a dish, hands already moving. He finishes it, slides the plate across the table, and it stops in front of an empty chair.

Video script30s
0:00-0:04

Your content is getting read. It is just not getting credited.

Overhead on hands plating a dish, already in motion as the frame opens. Warm kitchen light. Text hook: READ. USED. UNCREDITED.

0:04-0:10

The engine takes what you published, builds the answer, then names a competitor in it.

Hands slide the finished plate across the table. Camera tracks the plate. It stops in front of an empty chair. Hold one beat before cutting.

0:10-0:15

Four years of content. You are the ingredient. Someone else is the meal.

Cut to Harry across the table, static medium, dry delivery. Empty chair still visible behind him.

0:15-0:21

Free audit shows you where that is happening, prompt by prompt, and what is missing.

Cut to screen, a list of prompts with competitor names highlighted and the client name absent. Blur real identifiers. One cut per second down the list.

0:21-0:26

We grew LLM brand mentions for an Atlanta retailer by six twenty one percent.

Lower third card: SYLVANE, ATLANTA. 621 PERCENT LLM BRAND MENTION GROWTH. Hold two full seconds so it can be read.

0:26-0:30

Thirty minutes, someone senior. Apply below, it takes a minute.

Medium on Harry, direct to lens, hands still. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, 8 QUESTIONS, 60 SECONDS. Cut hard on the last word.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • Your content is feeding the answer. A competitor is named in it.
  • You paid for the ingredients. Somebody else is being served.
  • Read, used, uncredited. That is the new default.
  • Find out what your content is actually earning you. Free, 30 minutes.

Primary text

  • Your content is being read. That was never the problem. The problem is what it is being read for. The engine takes what you published, builds an answer out of it, and names a different company inside that answer. You funded the ingredients. Somebody else got served. The free AI Search audit shows you where that is happening, prompt by prompt, what is missing, and the three moves that get your name into the answer your own material is building. 30 minutes with someone senior. Apply in 60 seconds.
  • Four years of content. Every guide, every comparison page, every piece your team argued over. It is being read. That was never the problem. The problem is what it is being read for. An answer engine takes what you published, uses it to build the answer, and then names a different company inside that answer. Your material did the work. Someone else got the recommendation. You paid for the ingredients and a competitor got served the meal. And nothing in your reporting shows it. There is no line item for content that was consumed and uncredited. The free AI Search audit finds it. Before your call we grade your site against SOURC-E, the six part framework Harry wrote the book on, and we pull the prompts where your category gets answered to check whose name comes back. On the call, 30 minutes with a senior member of the team, you get your score, the citation gap, and the three moves that get your name inside the answers your own content is building. Three moves in priority order, not a 60 page audit. We grew LLM brand mentions for Sylvane, an Atlanta retailer, by 621 percent. We grew organic traffic 60 percent for a major national office supplies retailer. 120 plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta. Named best large SEO agency seven times. For businesses over $1M in revenue. 60 seconds to apply, 8 questions, we read every one. The plan is yours whether you hire us or not.

17 · Second Costs More Than First

Problem Agitation

Reason to buy: Citation position compounds, so taking a position back off whoever holds it costs more than taking it while it is open, which makes waiting for certainty the most expensive decision on the table rather than the cautious one.

Hooks · 3 variations, one body3 takes

Verbal hook, bold statementBeing named second costs more to fix than being named first cost to win. That is the whole argument.

Text hook, intriguing questionWhat does it cost you to be the second name?

Visual hook, hands busy talkerOverhead on Harry stacking coins into two piles of very different heights, hands already stacking as the frame opens. He keeps adding to the tall one the entire time he talks.

Video script30s
0:00-0:04

Being named second costs more than being named first.

Overhead on hands already stacking coins into two piles as the frame opens. Hard side light, deep shadow. Text hook: SECOND COSTS MORE.

0:04-0:09

Nothing to do with our pricing. Taking a position back off someone is harder.

Hands keep adding to the taller stack while he talks. Never stop the hands. Slow push in on the two piles.

0:09-0:16

Every month a competitor holds it, they get quoted, repeated, corroborated. It feeds itself.

Cut to Harry, static medium, seated, unhurried. Let a full beat of silence sit after the word itself.

0:16-0:21

Which makes waiting to see if this is real the expensive option. Not the careful one.

Punch in 150 percent across the line. Subtitles just below center. No music swell, keep the bed flat under him.

0:21-0:26

The free audit tells you where you sit today. And who is named instead.

Cut to scorecard graphic, six criteria, score revealed, then the citation gap list. One cut per second.

0:26-0:30

Thirty minutes with someone senior. Apply below, eight questions.

Medium on Harry, direct to lens, hands finally still. End card: FREE AI SEARCH AUDIT, APPLY IN 60 SECONDS. Hard cut, no tail.

Not filmed · for the ad build

Headlines

  • Being named second costs more to fix than being named first cost to win.
  • Waiting for certainty is the expensive option, not the safe one.
  • Citation position compounds. That is the entire argument.
  • The bill for waiting is not due yet. It is still adding up.

Primary text

  • Here is the only urgency argument we will make. Citation position compounds. Once an engine settles on a name for your category, that name gets quoted, repeated and corroborated, and every month it holds, the position gets more expensive to take back. Which makes waiting to see if AI search is real the most expensive option on your desk, not the careful one. The free AI Search audit tells you where you sit today. Score out of six, the citation gap, three moves in order. 30 minutes with someone senior. Apply in 60 seconds.
  • The most expensive thing you can do right now is wait to see if this is real. Not because of a deadline. There is no deadline. Because of how citation position behaves. Once an answer engine settles on a name for your category, that name gets quoted, repeated and corroborated across everything the engine reads next. The position feeds itself. Every month it sits with a competitor, it costs more to take back than it would have cost to take while it was open. So the arithmetic is not complicated. Being named first is a cost. Being named second is a bigger cost, later, and it grows quietly while you decide. The free AI Search audit tells you exactly where you sit today. Before the call we grade your site against SOURC-E, the six part framework Harry wrote the book on, and pull where the engines currently cite competitors instead of you. On the call, 30 minutes with a senior member of the team, you get your score, the citation gap, and the three moves that close the biggest gap first. StudioHawk runs search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. 120 plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta. Named best large SEO agency seven times. 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. Harry founded the business at 17 and wrote the book on SOURC-E. For businesses over $1M in revenue where search matters to how you get customers. Applying takes 60 seconds, 8 questions, we read every one. You keep the plan whether you hire us or not.
Hammer Them · the 72 hours before the call
What this is (SOP-02): high-frequency content retargeting. Once someone books, they get hit with 29 short vertical videos over the following three days. It runs on familiarity bias and the mere-exposure effect: by the time they join the Zoom they feel like they already know Harry and every doubt has been answered by someone who was not in the room to be argued with. Four pillars, one idea per video, nothing over 60 seconds.
Rules for this batch specifically: vertical 9:16, phone quality is fine and often better, no copyrighted music, direct to camera. And the one that is easy to get wrong: the viewer has already booked. Never re-pitch, never say "apply below", never explain the audit from scratch. They know what it is. They are quietly wondering whether saying yes was a good idea. The job is to remove that doubt.

Seeded · dual-purpose six

6 shorts

These six were written as confirmation-page breakout modules under SOP-28, and they belong to this library too. Film them vertical and they serve both jobs.

Is this actually a sales call?~60s
~60s

Straight answer: it's a conversation with a senior person from my team, and at the end of it we'll tell you whether we think we can help. If we can, we'll say how, and you can decide. If we can't, we'll say that instead. What it isn't is a slide deck and a price reveal. You'll be doing most of the talking, because the useful part is us understanding your market.

The biggest pre-call anxiety. Answering it plainly is worth more than any amount of reassurance elsewhere on the page.

Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).

Why is the audit free?~60s
~60s

Because a fair number of the businesses we audit end up asking us to run the plan, and that's how the agency grows. That's the entire model, there's nothing underneath it. We don't sell your data, there's no trial that starts billing, and there's no upsell waiting at the end of the call. If the plan is something your own team should run, we'll tell you that, and you keep it either way.

Same answer as VSL beat 5, deliberately. Repetition from a second angle is what makes it believed.

Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).

We already have an SEO agency.~90s
~90s

Good, most businesses we speak to do, and plenty of those agencies are doing solid work. This isn't a pitch to fire anyone. What we're looking at is specifically AI search, which is the part most agencies haven't built a method for yet, because it's genuinely new and it works differently to ranking. So treat this as a second opinion on one specific thing. You'll get a score, the citations showing who's being recommended instead of you, and three moves. Hand all of it to your current agency the same afternoon if you like. If it turns out you'd rather we ran it, we can talk about that, but that's your call to make after you've seen the work, not before.

The most common real situation for this buyer. The trap is making it a pitch to switch, which triggers loyalty and defensiveness.

Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).

What is SOURC-E?~2 min
~2 min

It's the six-part framework we grade you against, and it's the thing I wrote the book on. Rather than give you the acronym, here's what it's actually asking. Can the answer engines read your site properly. Do they have a reason to trust it. Is what you publish structured so a machine can lift an answer out of it and attribute that answer to you. Are you being cited anywhere the engines already look. Six signals, each scored, and the reason it's six rather than four hundred is that these are the ones that decide whether you get recommended. On the call we go through your score on each one and which to fix first.

Filming this saves ten minutes of definitions on every single call. Highest time-saving module of the six.

Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).

How is AI search different from SEO?~2 min
~2 min

Traditional SEO competes for a position on a page of ten links. AI search competes to be one of two or three businesses a machine names in an answer. That difference sounds small and it changes almost everything. There's no second page to creep up from, you're either in the answer or you're not. Being cited compounds, because engines lean on sources they've already used. And you can't buy your way in, there's no auction. So the work shifts from chasing positions to being the most readable, most corroborated, most quotable source in your category. Your rankings can be completely healthy while this is happening, which is exactly why most owners don't notice until the traffic has already gone.

The category question. Also the one that makes the offer feel urgent without any invented scarcity.

Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).

What actually happens in the thirty minutes?~60s
~60s

Before we speak we've already graded your site and pulled the citations, so we're not spending your time gathering information. First five minutes, you tell us what the business actually needs, because the scorecard doesn't know that. Next fifteen, we walk you through what we found: your score on each of the six signals, and specifically where AI is naming competitors instead of you. Last ten, the three moves in priority order and why that order. Then we're done. If there's a version where we run it for you, we'll say so, and if there isn't, we'll say that.

Removes procedural uncertainty, which is a quiet no-show driver.

Also a confirmation-page breakout module (SOP-28).

Questions

6 shorts

The foundational things a prospect wonders once the booking confirmation lands. Answer these and the call starts at the second question instead of the first.

What AI search actually is45s

Kills: I keep hearing about AI search. What is it actually, and why would it change anything for a business like mine?

0-5s

AI search is not a new Google. It is a new middleman.

Start mid-motion. Harry sets a phone face-up on the desk showing an AI answer, then looks up to lens. Direct address, dry, no smile. Text hook in native uploader, block caps, upper third: NOT A NEW GOOGLE. A NEW MIDDLEMAN. Must land with sound off.

5-14s

Someone used to type a question, get ten blue links, and pick one. Now they ask a model, and they get one paragraph with three or four companies named in it.

Hands busy. Counts the two states on his fingers, ten links then one paragraph. B-roll option: screen recording of a real AI answer for a generic category, company names blurred, cut in at 8s for 3 seconds only.

14-26s

You are either in that paragraph or you are not. There is no page two. There is no scrolling down to find you. It is a shortlist, and it gets built without you in the room.

Slow down here. Pause a full beat after "or you are not". This is the fear beat, so play it flat, not dramatic. Hold on face, no cutaway.

26-36s

That is the whole change. Search used to send people to you so they could make up their mind. Now something else makes up their mind first, and then decides whether to send them at all.

Slight lean in. Conversational, like he is explaining it to one person across a table, not presenting.

36-45s

So when we go through your scorecard, that is the thing we are actually measuring. Not where you rank. Whether you get named.

Settle back. Land it and cut hard on "named". No CTA, no card, no music. Subtitles just below center frame throughout.

The foundational definition piece. Almost everyone who books has heard the term and quietly does not want to admit they cannot define it. This lets them arrive fluent instead of nervous, which raises how honestly they talk on the call. Deliberately reframes the metric from rank to citation, which every other video in the library then leans on. Also works as an organic Reel and as the embedded video on the booking confirmation page.

Does this actually apply to my industry?48s

Kills: Sure, this matters for tech companies. Does it matter for a business in my category, at my size, in my market?

0-5s

Fair question to be sitting on right now. Does any of this actually apply to your industry, or is it a tech thing.

Open mid-shrug so there is motion in frame at frame one. Even, unbothered delivery. Text hook, block caps: OR IS IT JUST A TECH THING.

5-15s

Here is the honest test, and it takes about forty seconds. Open ChatGPT. Type: best whatever you sell, in whatever city you sell it. Then read what comes back.

Holds up phone, thumb typing, does not show the screen. Keeping the screen hidden holds curiosity. Delivery is instructional and calm, like giving directions.

15-27s

It will name three or four businesses. If you are in there, good. If you are not, someone in your category is, and they are being recommended to a buyer who never sees your site, never sees your ads, and never learns you exist.

This is the envy beat, so underplay it. No emphasis, no eyebrow. The line does the work. Hold the shot, no cuts, let it sit for a beat after "exist".

27-38s

And it does not really matter what you or I think about AI search. Your buyer already asked it. The answer already had names in it. Neither of those is waiting on our opinion.

Small dismissive hand gesture on "what you or I think". Dry. This is the line to shoot twenty times until it sounds thrown away rather than delivered.

38-48s

Do that search before we talk. Whatever it says, bring it. Good result or bad result, it is the most useful thing you can walk in with.

Direct to lens, unhurried. Cut immediately after "walk in with". No end card.

Kills the biggest silent doubt in the 72 hour window, which is not skepticism about AI search in general, it is a quiet belief that it will not apply to their category. Envy is the amplifier and it is factual, because the model genuinely will name somebody. The homework is the real payload: a prospect who runs that search arrives with a personal stake and a much lower chance of no showing. Also use as SMS content 24 hours before the call.

How this differs from the SEO I already pay for48s

Kills: I already pay someone for SEO every month. Is this the same job with a new name on it?

0-6s

If you already pay for SEO, this is the part worth ten seconds of your time. It is not the same job with a new name on it.

Open on a slight tilt up from desk to face for first frame motion. Matter of fact, no defensiveness, this is not a shot at their current agency. Text hook: NOT THE SAME JOB WITH A NEW NAME.

6-16s

Traditional SEO asks one question. Where do we rank. And a rank is a real place, you can go and look at it, you can screenshot it and put it in a monthly report.

Hands trace a vertical list in the air. Light, almost amused on "put it in a monthly report", never sneering.

16-30s

AI search asks something different. When someone asks about this category, does the model say our name. That is not a position on a page. It is whether you are part of the answer, and it gets built out of what the rest of the internet says about you, not just what your site says about itself.

The key line is "not just what your site says about itself". Slow it down and hold on it. No cutaway, face only, so the distinction registers. This is the densest beat in the batch, so do not rush the front half to make room, cut a clause on set if it is running hot.

30-41s

So the work is different, the reporting is different, and a rankings report will never show you that gap. It will look fine right up until it does not.

Flat delivery on the last line. Dry Harry. Do not smile through it. Pause a full beat before the final beat starts.

41-48s

That is why we grade it separately before we speak. Two different scoreboards. You are probably only reading one of them.

Settle, hold eye contact, cut hard. No music, no sting, no logo.

This is the conceptual separation the whole offer depends on. If they think this is rebadged SEO, the call becomes a price comparison against their current invoice. If they understand it is a second scoreboard they have never seen, the call becomes a diagnosis. Written carefully so it does not attack their existing agency, since that objection belongs to another pillar and attacking it here makes them defensive early. Also strong as a cold organic Reel.

Who is the guy in these videos44s

Kills: Who is Harry Sanders and why should I take his read on my business seriously?

0-5s

You have had some bloke with an Australian accent talking at you about search for a couple of days now. Fair to ask who I am.

Open on a small self aware shrug, motion in frame one. Slightly amused at himself. This piece only works if it is under sold. Text hook: WHO IS THIS GUY.

5-15s

I started StudioHawk at 17. It was me, in a bedroom, doing SEO for anyone who would pay me. There was no plan past that.

Plain telling, no nostalgia, no inspirational music energy. Optional single still of early days at 9s for two seconds, then straight back to face.

15-26s

It is now teams in Melbourne, London and Atlanta, 120 plus specialists, and it has been named best large SEO agency seven times.

Rattle this off quickly and slightly flat. The credentials should sound like admin, not like a boast. Optional lower third text listing the three cities, block caps, out of the safe zone.

26-36s

Forbes 30 Under 30 happened. Forbes and BBC World News happened. I only mention any of it because you are about to hand over 30 minutes, and you should know who you are handing it to.

Direct to lens. The justification line is the point, deliver it as a courtesy rather than a flex.

36-44s

That is the CV. On the call it is worth almost nothing. What matters is what your scorecard says.

Cut hard on "says". No end card, no logo, no music.

Familiarity and identity. Mere exposure only converts to trust if the face has a name and a story attached, and this gives them both in under a minute. The self deflating close is doing real work: it signals the call is about them, not a 30 minute credential parade, which is exactly the fear a sophisticated buyer has after booking with a founder led agency. Sits early in the 72 hour rotation, ideally touch two or three.

Is StudioHawk a real agency or a good funnel50s

Kills: Is this an actual agency with actual clients, or a slick funnel with one guy behind it?

0-5s

Reasonable thing to be wondering after you book. Is this a real agency, or a very good funnel.

Direct to camera, first frame already mid sentence. No defensiveness. Say it like he has heard it before and thinks it is a fair thing to ask. Text hook: REAL AGENCY, OR GOOD FUNNEL.

5-15s

We run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. 4.9 stars from 272 Google reviews. That is the normal set of receipts and you can go and check all of it.

Quick, unemotional list. Optional clean lower third with the three names, block caps. Do not linger, the logos are not the point of this video.

15-30s

Here is the one I would actually check though. Samsung came to us because ChatGPT recommended us. Not an ad, not a referral, not someone we already knew. A model got asked who to use, and it said our name.

This is the beat. Slow right down. Full stop before "Samsung". Hold on face, no cutaway, no text overlay competing with the line. Shoot this take many times until it sounds like a fact and not a brag.

30-42s

I bring it up because it is the exact thing we are going to look at on your site. We are not selling you a theory about how buyers might behave one day. It is how one of our own clients found us.

Hands settle. Even, grounded, quiet confidence. No emphasis needed, the previous beat carries it.

42-50s

Everything else on that list is just the reason we are allowed to talk about it.

Dry close, small pause, cut hard. No music, no sting.

Legitimacy plus mechanism proof in one piece, which is why the Samsung fact leads over the client logos. Logos prove the agency is real. Samsung proves the thing we are about to grade them on is real and already producing revenue for us, which is much harder to argue with. Deliberately does not use the Sylvane or organic traffic results, because this video is about whether we exist, not whether we get results, and those belong to a separate piece. Also works well as the second video in a reminder email.

What SOURC-E actually is48s

Kills: What is this framework you are grading me against, and do I need to understand it before the call?

0-5s

SOURC-E. You are going to see that word on your scorecard, so here is what it is before it turns up.

Open holding a printed scorecard page, tilt it up into frame at frame one, then set it down. Do not let the page be readable. Text hook: WHAT IS SOURC-E.

5-15s

It is six things that decide whether an answer engine names you when somebody asks about your category. I wrote the book on it, which is still a slightly odd sentence to say out loud.

Throwaway delivery on the book line. Small shrug. It must not sound like a credential drop, it is an aside.

15-28s

The acronym is not the point. The point is that without a framework, AI visibility is a vibe. Someone tells you that you need to be more authoritative, you nod, nobody measures anything, and in 90 days you still cannot tell whether it worked.

This is the frustration beat and it will be the most recognized moment in the video. Hands out, palms up on "you nod". Slightly weary, like he has sat in that meeting.

28-40s

Six parts. A grade on each one. So you can see which ones are actually costing you, and which ones you can stop worrying about for now.

Counts on fingers. Optional simple text overlay: SIX PARTS. A GRADE ON EACH. No fancy graphics, no animated framework diagram, keep it phone quality.

40-48s

And you do not need to study any of it before we talk. It is our job to explain the grade. It is not your job to learn the framework.

Direct to lens, unhurried, warm but flat. Cut hard on "framework". No end card.

Removes the low grade dread that the call will be an exam they have not studied for. This audience is not trying to learn SEO, so the closing permission line is the most important sentence in the piece. Naming that the framework produces a grade also pre sells the format of the call without pitching anything, because they arrive expecting a scorecard rather than a chat. The line about what they can stop worrying about is deliberate: it signals we will tell them what to ignore, which is the fastest available trust signal against a vendor who wants to sell everything. Kept deliberately vague on how many parts will or will not matter, since that is decided by their actual scorecard, not by a script.

2nd Layer Questions

6 shorts

The foundational things a prospect wonders once the booking confirmation lands. Answer these and the call starts at the second question instead of the first.

How did a competitor get cited and I didn't?45s

Kills: If AI engines are already recommending a competitor over me, how did they actually get there? What did they do that I didn't?

0-6s

The most common thing people ask me after they book this call is, how did the other guy get in there.

Direct to camera, vertical, phone at eye level. Start mid thought, no greeting, no intro card. Plain room, natural light. Hands still.

6-14s

The honest answer is nobody bought their way in. There's no ad slot inside an AI answer. Not yet, anyway.

Dry and flat. Small shrug on the last line. Do not smile. Half second pause after "anyway" before the cut.

14-26s

Usually one page on their site answers the question cleanly. Straight answer near the top, plain language. And a few other places online say the same thing about them. That's it. The model picks whatever is easiest to quote and easiest to check.

Cut to a screen recording of an assistant answer with the citation panel open, competitor brand names blurred. Voice continues over the b-roll, come back to face on "easiest to check".

26-36s

Your site probably answers that same question. It's just answering it like a brochure. Three scrolls down, wrapped in a value proposition, in language no one would ever quote back.

Cut to a scroll of a generic corporate page, brand blurred, scrolling past hero and stat bar before any actual answer appears. Deliver "like a brochure" with a slight head tilt, observational not sneering.

36-45s

When we talk, I'll show you the page the engine is actually pulling from in your category. It's usually less impressive than people expect. Which is the good news.

Back to camera. Land "which is the good news" quietly and stop. Hold one beat, then cut. No sign off, no smile into the cut.

This is the anchor piece of the pillar. Once someone accepts they aren't being cited, the very next thought is envy: what did they do that I didn't. Answering the mechanism plainly, and making it sound achievable rather than mystical, turns envy into appetite before the call. Also works as a standalone Reel on organic, and as a follow up asset for anyone who booked but rescheduled.

How long before an engine says my name?50s

Kills: Now that I know I'm not getting cited, how long does it realistically take to fix? Weeks, months, or is this a two year project?

0-7s

This is usually the second question, right after, am I behind. How long until one of these things actually says my name.

Direct to camera, unhurried. Hands out of frame. Say it like you're repeating someone else's question back to them.

7-18s

Two different answers, and the difference matters. A single answer can move quickly. When a page is genuinely built to be quoted, it can get picked up faster than a ranking ever moved. That part surprises people.

Two fingers up on "two different answers", then drop the hand and leave it down. No selling tone, no lift at the end of the sentence.

18-30s

Becoming the default takes longer. Being the name that comes up whether someone asks in ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google's AI answers, phrased five different ways, on a Tuesday. That one takes months, and anyone who gives you a date is guessing.

Slow the pace across the list. Cut to a quick screen recording of the same question typed into three different assistants, brand names blurred, then back to face on "anyone who gives you a date".

30-42s

The part worth understanding is that it compounds. Once you're the source that gets cited, you get repeated, and being repeated is what gets you cited again. Sylvane, a retailer in Atlanta, grew their brand mentions across the language models by 621 percent.

Say the number once, flatly, and move on. No zoom, no emphasis, no animated graphic. A plain static number card is the most it should get.

42-50s

Which also means being cited second costs more to fix later than being cited first cost to win. We'll look at where you sit on that.

Straight to lens, level delivery, no urgency in the voice. Stop after "that", hold a beat, cut.

Timeline is the question that decides whether they show up with real expectations or with a fantasy. Giving them the honest split, fast for one answer and slow for the default position, buys enormous credibility before the call and pre frames the only permitted urgency argument: citation position compounds. Reusable in nurture email as a text version, and in the pre call reminder sequence at hour 24.

Does this replace my SEO or sit next to it?45s

Kills: Is AI search a separate program on top of the SEO I already pay for, or does it replace it? Am I about to be sold a second budget?

0-6s

The follow up I get to almost everything I've just said. Is this instead of my SEO, or on top of it.

Direct to camera, conversational, like you're answering across a table. Slightly closer framing than the other pieces in this set.

6-16s

Neither, and I'd rather say that now than on the call. It's the same ground, read by a different reader. These engines crawl the same pages and the same mentions your rankings already run on.

Flat, matter of fact. No hand movement at all. This one earns trust by being boring.

16-30s

What changes is what wins. Ranking rewards the page that looks the most authoritative. Getting cited rewards the page that's easiest to quote accurately. Related jobs. Not the same job. And most sites only do the first one. Often very well.

Cut to split screen b-roll: a long polished service page on one side, a short clean answer block on the other. No labels, no arrows. Back to face on "often very well".

30-38s

So it isn't a bolt on department. Mostly it's the same work aimed slightly differently, plus a measurement layer you don't have right now.

Back to camera, even tone. Do not lean in on "measurement layer", it should sound like a fact, not a hook.

38-45s

Some of your pages are probably already close. Finding those is the first thing we do, before anyone talks about building anything.

End on "anything". Clean cut, no trailing beat.

Kills the quiet suspicion that they booked a call where they'll be sold a whole second retainer. Framing AI search as the same substrate read by a different reader keeps the conversation inside the budget they already believe in, so they arrive open instead of defensive. Also a strong reply asset when a prospect emails back with "we already spend on SEO" before the call.

Will this put my current rankings at risk?45s

Kills: Search still brings in most of my leads. If we start chasing AI citations, am I risking the rankings that are already paying the bills?

0-8s

This is the one that keeps people up before the call, and it's the right question. If we go chasing citations, what happens to the rankings I already have.

Direct to camera, slower than the rest of the set. Treat it seriously. No reassuring smile, no soft voice.

8-18s

Nothing. And I'd be suspicious of anyone whose answer to that is complicated. There's no switch. You're not moving your site from one mode into another.

Say "Nothing." flat and let it sit for a full half second of silence before continuing. The pause is the reassurance.

18-30s

It's the same kind of work. Answer the question earlier on the page. Get mentioned accurately in more places. Google has rewarded all of that for years. These engines just read it more literally.

Cut to b-roll of a page being edited, an answer paragraph physically dragged up above the fold. Simple screen capture, no cursor theatrics.

30-40s

The real risk isn't losing rankings. It's spending a quarter rewriting pages that were already fine. That's what the scorecard is for. It tells you what to leave alone.

Back to camera. Land "it tells you what to leave alone" as the point of the whole video. Slight slow down on that sentence.

40-45s

Bring the pages you're proudest of. Those are usually the interesting ones.

Casual, almost an afterthought, like you just remembered it. Cut on the last word.

Risk aversion is the number one silent no show driver for an established business with working search. This piece converts fear into curiosity by reframing the actual downside as wasted effort, not lost traffic, and it hands them a small pre call task that raises attendance. Good candidate for hour 48 of the retargeting window, once the earlier explainers have landed.

Could my team just do this in-house?55s

Kills: Now that I understand roughly how citations work, could my marketing team just do this themselves? Do I actually need you for it?

0-7s

A few people have asked me a version of this between booking and the call. Could my team just do this in-house.

Direct to camera, relaxed posture. This is the least defensive video in the set, play it that way. No arms crossed.

7-16s

Mostly yes, and I mean it. The on-page part isn't mysterious. A good marketing manager can rewrite a page so it answers the question in the first line instead of the fourth paragraph.

No hedging face, no qualifier eyebrow. Say it like you believe it, because giving this away is the entire point of the piece.

16-30s

Two things are hard. Knowing which questions actually matter in your category, because it's never the ones you'd guess. And measuring any of it. Citations don't show up in Analytics. There's no rank tracker that tells you a model quietly stopped naming you last month.

Cut to a screen recording of a standard analytics dashboard, scroll it slowly, then cut back to face. The joke is silent: the dashboard says nothing about this.

30-42s

So the gap usually isn't effort. It's instruments. Nobody I speak to is lazy about this. They're just working hard on a report that only measures the part that's shrinking.

Slow right down here. This is the line that lands. Hold eye contact through the whole beat, no b-roll over it.

42-55s

Which is why you keep the scorecard and the three moves either way. If you take it in-house and do it properly, good. That's a much better year than finding out in twelve months that someone else wrote the answer first.

Straight to lens, no urgency in the voice, no pitch inflection. End flat and cut immediately.

The in-house question is usually a politeness cover for do I actually need this call. Conceding the easy half openly, and locating the real gap in measurement rather than effort, makes the call feel useful regardless of outcome and lowers the pressure they're bracing for. Doubles as a strong organic Reel and as the answer to a post call stall.

Does this work in a boring industry?50s

Kills: This all sounds like it's for consumer brands. Does any of it apply if I sell something unglamorous to a few hundred businesses?

0-7s

If you're sitting there thinking, this is all very nice but I sell industrial pumps to four hundred companies, stay with me.

Direct to camera, handheld is fine and preferred here. Slightly amused, never mocking. You are on their side of the joke.

7-20s

Boring is an advantage. Ask one of these engines for the best running shoe and there are thousands of sources fighting over it. Ask who supplies a specific part in a specific state, and there might only be a handful of pages on the internet that answer it properly.

Cut to a screen recording of a narrow B2B style question typed into an assistant, showing a short citation list of three or four sources. Brand names blurred.

20-32s

Thin ground is cheap to take. In most B2B categories, the reason a competitor gets named isn't that they're better than you. It's that they were the only one who bothered to write the answer down.

Back to face, flat delivery. Do not push this line or add emphasis. It does its own work.

32-42s

And the buyers are there. Samsung found us through a ChatGPT recommendation. Not an ad, not a referral. Someone asked, and we were the answer.

Say the Samsung line once and move straight on. No graphic, no logo, no smile. Understating it is the whole effect.

42-50s

Before we speak I'll run the real questions from your category, not generic ones. You'll see how contested it actually is instead of guessing.

Even tone, no build. End on "guessing", hold a beat, cut.

Relevance doubt is the specific reason B2B and industrial bookers ghost: they assume the material is built for consumer brands and they'll waste half an hour. Turning boring into an advantage flips the doubt into an edge, and the Samsung line proves the buyer behavior exists in exactly the sober, unglamorous way they'd need to believe it. Use it early in the window for any booker whose application flags a niche or industrial category, and as a standalone piece on LinkedIn.

Objections

6 shorts

Price, time, skepticism, competitor, and the quiet one: is this a disguised sales pitch. Handled on video before the call so they do not have to raise them live.

Is this actually a sales pitch?45s

Kills: "I booked a free audit call. This is going to be thirty minutes of someone pitching me a retainer."

0-6s

You've booked, and somewhere in the back of your head there's a voice going: this is a pitch, isn't it.

Direct to camera, medium shot, standing. No smile on the first line. Deadpan. Let the last four words land flat like he's saying it for them.

6-14s

Fair thought. Most free audits are a pitch wearing a lab coat. Someone reads your own homepage back to you for a while and then lands on a pricing slide.

Small shrug on "fair thought". Slight dry lift on "lab coat", no laugh. B-roll option: two seconds of a generic slide deck landing on a pricing slide, cut fast, no numbers legible.

14-25s

Here's what actually happens on yours. The work is already done before you show up. Your SOURC-E scorecard, and the list of places an AI engine names a competitor in your category instead of you.

Punch in tighter. Slow the pace down here, this is the reassurance beat. B-roll: over-shoulder of a real scorecard on screen, competitor name blurred out.

25-34s

Thirty minutes. We go through what's broken, in what order, and the three moves that close the biggest gap first. You keep all of it.

Back to medium. Count the three things on fingers, hands stay busy. Flat delivery on "you keep all of it", do not sell it.

34-40s

For context, we've been named best large SEO agency seven times and we run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. This is not a hustle. It's how we work out whether we're useful to you.

Say the credentials fast and slightly bored, like reading a bio he did not write. That is what makes it land. Text overlay: 7x BEST LARGE SEO AGENCY.

40-45s

If you want us to do the work at the end, say so and we'll talk. If you don't, you walk off with the plan. I'm not going to chase you.

Hold direct eye line. Stop talking a beat before the cut. No CTA card, no logo sting, hard cut to black.

Kills the single biggest cancel and no-show driver in the 72 hour window. Every other objection piece is easier to hear once this one has run, so it should be first in the retarget rotation and highest frequency. Also works as the first reply in the confirmation email sequence and as the pinned video on the booking confirmation page.

We already have an agency45s

Kills: "We already pay an agency for this. Taking this call feels disloyal, and it's probably a waste if we're not switching."

0-6s

So you've already got an agency, and now you've booked a call with another one. Feels a bit disloyal.

Direct to camera, seated, relaxed. Say it like he's naming the thing they haven't said out loud. Light, not accusing.

6-14s

It isn't. I'm not going to ask you to fire anybody. Genuinely. Plenty of the businesses I talk to have an agency doing perfectly good work.

Open palms once on "genuinely", then hands settle. Unhurried. This is the permission beat, do not rush it.

14-26s

Here's the useful part though. Ask them one question before we speak. Ask them where you get cited in AI answers, and where a competitor gets cited instead of you. Not rankings. Citations. Two different things.

Lean in slightly. Hold up one finger on "one question". Text overlay on "Not rankings. Citations." B-roll: an AI answer on a phone screen with a company name highlighted.

26-37s

If they come back with a number, brilliant, you're in good hands and you'll get very little out of me. If they go quiet, that isn't them being bad at their job. It just means it isn't being measured, and you'd have had no way of knowing that.

Genuinely warm on "brilliant". Then flatten out. Do not gloat on the second half, the whole piece dies if it sounds like a swipe at their agency.

37-45s

Bring them on the call if you want. I don't mind. It's awkward for about ninety seconds and then it's just useful for everyone.

Small shrug, half smile on "ninety seconds". Cut on the word "everyone", no outro.

This is the biggest identity conflict for an established buyer and the objection they will never raise on the call, they will just cancel instead. The reframe deliberately gives them a job to do with their current agency, which converts guilt into curiosity. Reusable as a LinkedIn post and as an in-call talk track when the prospect discloses an incumbent.

We're number one on Google, so why does this matter?50s

Kills: "Our rankings are strong. We already win search. What could an AI audit possibly tell me?"

0-7s

Some of you have booked this call while sitting at number one on Google, quietly wondering what on earth I could tell you.

Direct to camera, standing, arms loose. Dry, almost amused. No edge in the voice.

7-16s

Congratulations, seriously, that took work. Here's the uncomfortable bit. Ranking first and getting cited are now two separate jobs, and most people are only doing one of them.

Genuine on "congratulations". Then a beat of silence before "here's the uncomfortable bit". The pause does the work.

16-26s

Someone asks an AI engine for the best supplier in your category. It doesn't hand back ten blue links. It names two or three companies and that's the shortlist. Your number one ranking didn't fail there. It just wasn't in the room.

B-roll here, full screen: a real query typed into an AI engine, answer resolving, two or three brand names visible, competitor names blurred. Harry voice over. Come back to face for "wasn't in the room".

26-35s

Samsung found us through a ChatGPT recommendation. Not an ad, not a referral. A machine named us and they got in touch. That is not a future thing, that already happened.

Straight to camera, completely flat delivery. No emphasis, no eyebrow. The fact is the flex, the tone must not be. Text overlay: SAMSUNG. VIA CHATGPT.

35-45s

And this is the part that matters for you. Citation position compounds. Whoever gets named this year gets named more next year, because being the answer is what makes you the answer. Being second costs more to fix later than being first cost to win.

Slow right down. Simple hand gesture, one level then a higher level. This is the only urgency argument in the whole library, do not decorate it.

45-50s

So being number one isn't the answer to the question. It's just what you had before the question changed.

Hold still. Say it once, don't repeat it, cut on the last word.

Aimed at the strongest prospects in the batch, the ones most likely to cancel because they feel they have nothing to learn. Carries the only permitted urgency argument, compounding citation position, so it is the piece that converts a booked call into a call they actually want. Doubles as a cold acquisition hook and as an opening slide framing on the call itself.

My industry is different40s

Kills: "AI search advice is generic. My category is niche and none of this will apply to my business."

0-6s

Everybody says it. My industry's different. And honestly, they're usually half right.

Direct to camera, medium. Say "everybody says it" like he has heard it four times this week, because he has.

6-14s

Your industry is different. The buying cycle is different, the language is different, your customers ask questions nobody outside your world would even think to ask.

Nod along, concede properly. Do not undercut this beat, the concession is what buys the next one.

14-24s

What isn't different is that somebody typed one of those questions into an AI engine this morning and got back an answer with a company name in it. That name is either yours or it's somebody else's. There's no third option.

Punch in. Flat, factual. Text overlay on "either yours or somebody else's". B-roll: a niche sounding query resolving into an answer with a highlighted brand name.

24-34s

Which is why we pull your actual category before the call, not a template. Your questions, your competitors. Sylvane is a retailer in Atlanta, probably nothing like what you do, and their brand mentions in the language models went up 621 percent. The method travels even when the industry doesn't.

Hands busy, maybe turning a laptop toward camera. Overlay: 621% LLM BRAND MENTIONS. Say the number once and move on.

34-40s

You'll be looking at your own category on the screen. And if it turns out you're already the named answer everywhere, I'll tell you that as well.

Small shrug on the last line. Honest, unbothered. Hard cut.

Kills the relevance doubt that makes sophisticated buyers cancel late, and does it with the strongest amplifier available, envy, because the competitor citation is pulled live and specific to them. The concession structure, agree fully then pivot on one fact, is the reusable spine for any "my industry is different" objection across the funnel.

How can this be free?40s

Kills: "Nothing senior is free. What's the catch, what am I actually paying with?"

0-6s

Question I get after people book. What's the catch. Why is this free.

Direct to camera, tight. No preamble, start mid thought like he's answering a message.

6-16s

There's no catch, but there is a reason. Doing this properly takes a senior person a few hours before you ever show up. We've got 120 plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta, so those hours cost us something. We're not pretending otherwise.

Matter of fact, slightly bored with his own explanation. Text overlay: MELBOURNE. LONDON. ATLANTA. B-roll option: someone actually working through a scorecard on a screen.

16-28s

We do it because it's the fastest honest way to find out if we should work together. Once your site's graded and the citation gap is pulled, one of two things is true. Either there's real ground to take and you can see it right there on the screen, or there isn't much, and we've both saved ourselves a quarter of pretending.

Slow down on "one of two things is true". Hold up two fingers, then drop the hand. Dry landing on "a quarter of pretending".

28-35s

So free isn't the hook. The scorecard is either uncomfortable or it isn't, and you'll know inside about ten minutes.

Straight to camera, still. This is the credibility beat, no movement, no overlay.

35-40s

You keep it either way. That's the whole model. There's no version of this where you leave with nothing.

Even tone, no lift on the last line. Cut immediately.

Sophisticated buyers price free as suspicious, and unresolved suspicion shows up as a no-show rather than a question. Naming the real cost to us and the real reason converts suspicion into respect. Also useful as an FAQ answer on the booking confirmation page and as a rebuttal in setter follow up messages.

You don't need to be technical35s

Kills: "I'm not technical and I don't have thirty minutes to sit there confused while someone talks about schema and crawl budgets."

0-6s

Small thing that stops people showing up. I'm not technical enough for this call.

Direct to camera, seated, casual, coffee in hand. Say it like he's repeating something a real person told him.

6-14s

You don't need to be. Nothing on this call requires you to know what a sitemap is. The technical part is our problem, not yours.

Relaxed, hands busy with the cup. Zero condescension in the delivery, this whole piece dies on tone.

14-25s

Nobody's going to make you defend your website. There's no quiz. And if one of our lot starts saying schema markup and canonical tags at you, stop them and make them say it again in English. That's a completely reasonable thing to ask for and we'll do it.

Lean in on "stop them". Slight smile. B-roll option: a scorecard on screen shown in plain language, one line per issue, no jargon visible.

25-32s

It's thirty minutes. You don't prepare anything, you don't bring reports, you don't need a login. The work is finished before you arrive.

Count the three things off, one hand. Unhurried, this is the pressure release beat.

32-35s

Show up with your calendar open and an honest opinion of your own website. That's it.

Say it, stop, cut. No sign off, no logo.

Removes the quiet embarrassment objection that a marketing manager or non technical owner will never voice, they simply reschedule and then ghost. Also lowers the bar on time by making thirty minutes feel like it costs them nothing to prepare for. Pairs directly with the Expectations pillar piece on who is on the call, and works as a reminder message ninety minutes before the call.

Expectations

5 shorts

What the call is, who is on it, what to have open, what happens after. Procedural uncertainty is a silent no-show driver, and this pillar is the cheapest fix for it.

The 30 minutes, start to finish55s

Kills: I booked it, but what is this call actually going to be? Thirty minutes of someone asking me qualifying questions before they pitch me?

0-6s

Thirty minutes is not long, so here is exactly how we spend yours.

Vertical 9:16, phone camera, seated at a desk, window light. Hard cut in on the first word. No greeting, no name card, no music. Flat, unhurried delivery. Optional on screen text: THE 30 MINUTES.

6-17s

First five minutes, we skip the discovery. We already graded your site before you joined, so we put your scorecard up and walk you through where it is weak.

Hold the same frame. Count the five on one hand, low and casual, do not perform it. Optional b-roll cutaway: a blurred scorecard on a laptop screen.

17-31s

The next ten is the part people go quiet for. We show you the questions your buyers are typing into AI, and who gets named in the answer. Sometimes that is you. Usually it is a competitor.

Slow down on the last two lines. No emphasis, let the fact do it. B-roll option: screen recording of an answer engine returning an answer with brand names visible, faces and client names blurred.

31-45s

Then ten minutes on three moves. Not thirty moves. The three that close the biggest part of that gap, in the order we would actually do them.

Back to camera. Dry. Slight shrug on not thirty moves.

45-55s

Last five is your questions. There is no deck, there is nothing to sign, and the plan is yours either way. If you want us to run it, that is a different conversation on a different day.

Even tone through to the end. Do not smile up at the last line. Cut immediately, no outro.

This is the spine of the pillar. It kills the quiet dread that a free call is thirty minutes of qualifying questions and a pitch, and it gives them a mental map so the calendar hold feels like a real appointment instead of a sales trap. Also works as the first video in the sequence after booking, and as the body of the confirmation email.

Who you are actually talking to45s

Kills: Is a junior setter going to read me a script for thirty minutes and then book me in with someone senior?

0-6s

Fair question after you book something that costs nothing. Who am I actually getting on this call.

Vertical 9:16, direct to camera, mid thought. No music. Slightly conversational, like answering a question someone just asked off camera.

6-16s

It is a senior person from our team. Not a setter, not somebody reading a script off a second screen. Someone who runs search for businesses your size and bigger.

Steady. Do not lean in on senior, say it like a fact you are mildly bored of repeating.

16-31s

We are a hundred and twenty plus specialists across Melbourne, London and Atlanta. We run search for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. And we have been named best large SEO agency seven times.

Deliver the credentials flat and fast, like reading a line off a form. Do not stack text overlays on every claim, one small lower third at most.

31-45s

The reason that matters is that nobody on this call has to go and check with somebody. You get an actual answer to whatever you ask, including if the answer is that you do not have a problem yet.

Land the last clause plainly and stop. No reassuring smile. Hard cut.

Removes the single biggest reason sophisticated buyers no show a free call: they assume the first thirty minutes is a screening layer. Naming that they may be told they do not have a problem is what makes the rest of it believable. Reusable as a reply to any prospect who asks who they are meeting.

We do the work before you sit down50s

Kills: Have they actually looked at my site, or am I about to get a generic presentation with my logo dropped into it?

0-6s

Something people do not expect. The audit happens before the call, not on it.

Vertical 9:16, direct to camera, standing or seated, phone quality fine. No music. Open cold on the line.

6-18s

Between now and your call we grade your site against SOURC-E. Six parts. It is the framework I wrote the book on, so it is not a checklist somebody downloaded.

Say the book line in passing, not as a boast. If you have a physical copy nearby, do not hold it up, let it sit in frame.

18-32s

Then we go and ask the answer engines the questions your buyers ask, and we write down who they name. That list is the whole point. It is not an opinion, it is what is on the screen when a customer goes looking.

Slight pause before that list is the whole point. B-roll option: a typed query and a returned answer, competitor names blurred.

32-42s

So by the time you join, your scorecard and your citation gap are already open on our side.

Back to camera, matter of fact.

42-50s

You are not walking us through your business for twenty minutes. We have done that part. You just tell us where we read it wrong.

Deliver the last line lightly, almost as an aside. Cut on it.

Kills the will this be generic doubt, which is the number one silent reason a booked call gets deprioritized. It also flips their job on the call from being interrogated to correcting us, which is a role they enjoy and will show up for. Pull the last beat as a standalone caption for the reminder email.

What to have open40s

Kills: Do I need to prepare anything? Should I pull reports or get my agency on the call?

0-5s

People keep asking what to prepare. Short answer, nothing.

Vertical 9:16, direct to camera, handheld is fine here. No music. Say it quickly, it is a small piece.

5-14s

You do not need to pull reports. You do not need your agency on the call. You do not need to know what SOURC-E stands for.

Three quick beats, do not count them on fingers. Keep it light.

14-27s

If you want to be useful to yourself, do one thing. Write down the name of one competitor you would hate to lose to. We will check live whether the answer engines name them instead of you.

Slow down for the last sentence. This is the line the whole video exists for. Do not name any company. Optional on screen text: ONE COMPETITOR. WRITE IT DOWN.

27-35s

Other than that, a laptop beats a phone. There is a screen share and you will want to see it properly.

Casual. Optional cutaway of a laptop with a screen share running, contents blurred.

35-40s

That is the whole prep. Takes a minute.

Cut immediately after. No sign off.

Two jobs. It removes the friction excuse of I have not had time to prepare, which is what people tell themselves when they cancel, and it plants a small pre call commitment that makes attendance feel like something they started. The one competitor line is the envy hook and it costs the viewer nothing to comply with.

If something comes up, move it45s

Kills: My week has blown up, or I am second guessing this. Do I just quietly not show?

0-6s

Small thing, and I would rather say it now than be precious about it later.

Vertical 9:16, direct to camera, relaxed, lower energy than the other pieces. No music. This one should feel like a note, not a message.

6-17s

If your week falls apart before the call, move it. There is a link in your confirmation email, it takes about ten seconds, and it costs you nothing with us.

Point loosely off camera on confirmation email. Optional b-roll: a reschedule link being clicked, times grayed out, nothing counted down.

17-27s

The reason I am asking you to move it rather than just not turn up is that senior time on the calendar is the one thing we are genuinely short of. Release the slot and somebody else uses it.

Say it plainly. No guilt, no numbers, no spots left. If it sounds like pressure, do the take again slower.

27-40s

And the honest reason not to push it out too far. Citation position compounds. Whoever gets named in your category this quarter becomes the default answer next quarter, and being second costs more to fix later than being first cost to win.

This is the only urgency argument in the batch. Deliver it as an observation, not a warning. Steady, no build.

40-45s

So move it if you need to. Just move it.

Half smile at most. Cut.

Directly attacks the no show. Giving explicit permission to reschedule converts a ghost into a rebooking, and it is the only place in the library where the compounding cost argument is allowed to appear, so it lands harder for being the exception. Send this one late in the 72 hour window, ideally the evening before.