← Back to Funnel HQ · Film day: webinar, the first eighteen → · The call funnel bank → · Hammer Them → · The five formats →

Webinar ads, taken straight out of the deck.

Cold direct response ads for the $7 two-day live event at webinar.studiohawk.com. Everything here is lifted from the 140-slide deck Harry actually presents, which means the ad promises what the room delivers, and every statistic already has the source on the slide it came from. Eighteen angles exist on the film day page; these twenty are new and none of them repeat those. Built to Jeremy's original SOP-31, one reason to buy per ad filmed whole, and SOP-27's timing. Sixteen are scripted in full with a 30 and a 60 second cut.

Offer: $7, two days liveSep 23 to 24, 12:00 to 1:30 PM ETOne cohort a month, no replay20 new reasons, 16 scriptedEvery stat sourced on the slide
Read this first: this is a different funnel from the audit ads, and the differences change every script.
1. The price is the filter, not an application. Paying $7 is the qualification, so no ad says "for businesses doing $1M+". The webinar sells a seat to owners and marketing leads; the audit sells a conversation to $1M+ businesses. Do not port a line between the two banks.
2. The scarcity is real, so use it. One cohort a month, live only, no replay, a fixed date. SOP-04 and SOP-30 both permit urgency only when it is genuine and warn that faked scarcity destroys trust; this one is genuine and it is the strongest lever this funnel has that the call funnel does not.
3. One CTA: save your seat. Not "apply", not "book a call". webinar.studiohawk.com, $7, and the date. Every 60-second cut names the date and "live only, no replay" in the last beat.
4. Ad length follows the offer. SOP-04: a longer event supports slightly longer ad video, 1 to 2 minutes. Half the assets short, half long, per SOP-26.
5. The date is hardcoded. Every script below says Sep 23 and 24. That is this cohort. Rewriting the last four words is the entire monthly refresh, and it doubles as SOP-26's fresh-creative cycle.
The dog food exercise, run on the deck

Twenty reasons a business owner would pay $7 and give up two mornings.

Each one is a different reason, taken from a specific slide, so the ad and the room agree. Slide numbers refer to the deck's own order. The eighteen existing angles are listed at the bottom so nobody films a duplicate.

#Reason to buyFromSOP-31 categoryHook styleStatus
W21ChatGPT reached 100 million users in two months. Nothing has ever moved this fast.Slide 2UrgencyShock statscripted
W22Six in ten US adults read AI summaries, and most would never tell you they use AISlide 4Problem agitationShock statscripted
W23You did not lose a ranking. You lost the click.Slide 6Problem agitationMyth-bustingscripted
W24Three prompts, six minutes, and you will know where you standSlide 7TacticalCall-outscripted
W25Recognition is not recall: knowing you exist and volunteering your name are two assetsSlide 8CuriosityMyth-bustingscripted
W26There is no page two of an AI answerSlide 9Problem agitationBold claimscripted
W27The machine just wrote your real competitor list, and it is not the one on your whiteboardSlide 9EnvyCuriosityscripted
W28Being named for the thing you do not want to sell is a positioning problemSlide 9CuriositySpecific questionscripted
W29The rent went up, the street got quieter, same landlordSlide 20Problem agitationPainscripted
W30Rented, borrowed, owned: sort every channel you pay forSlide 22TacticalYou already knowscripted
W31Being number one and being named are two different competitionsSlide 23Myth-bustingBold claimscripted
W32You were sold exercises, not a programmeSlide 25FrustrationAnalogyscripted
W33Sourced, considered, invisible: most well-run businesses are the middle oneSlide 26CuriositySpecific questionscripted
W34The sale is decided before you are in the roomSlide 27UrgencyShock statscripted
W35The three companies with the most to gain from you giving up are telling you not toSlide 30Social proofObjection-firstscripted
W36Four things being sold to you right now that you do not need to buySlide 40TacticalObjection-firstscripted
W37Three questions to ask whoever you are currently payingSlide 41FrustrationTacticalbrief below
W38Stop publishing more. There is no page eleven.Slide 41Myth-bustingBold claimbrief below
W39Why I am doing this at all, answered before you askSlide 16Objection-firstObjection-firstbrief below
W40One question now fans out into dozens you never seeSlide 34CuriosityCuriositybrief below

Already filmed on the film day page, do not duplicate: Samsung found us through ChatGPT · Stop paying twice for the same buyer · What optimizing for ChatGPT means · Learn SOURC-E not more AI tips · Ten Claude Skills yours to keep · Does AI name you or your rival · Get found like QuickBooks and Weber · Get in before the answer sets · Hold your agency accountable on AI · Your impressions rose, clicks fell · Two days live, 90 minutes a day, $7 · $7 to test it before you fund it · 621% more mentions in AI answers · Own the channel, stop renting clicks · Bring a case not another AI article · You have never once checked this · No developer, no rebuild, get cited · Bring your market, ask us live.

Day one · the scale of it

Three stats, three ads, all sourced on the slide.

W21 · Two months

UrgencyShock stat

Reason to buy: the speed of the shift is the argument for showing up now rather than next year. Nothing in consumer technology has moved this fast, and the numbers make the case without a single adjective.

30-second cut
0-5s

Instagram took two and a half years to reach a hundred million users. TikTok took nine months. ChatGPT took two.

Three figures on screen, one at a time. Small source line: UBS, reported by Reuters.

5-23s

Two months. That's how fast the place your customers ask questions changed, and most businesses have never once checked what it says about them. On the twenty-third and twenty-fourth I'll show you how to check, and what to do about the answer.

23-30s

Two days live, ninety minutes each, seven dollars. Link below.

Headlines
Instagram: 2.5 Years. TikTok: 9 Months. ChatGPT: 2. Search Changed In Two Months The Fastest Shift In Consumer Tech Happened To Search
Primary text
Instagram took about two and a half years to reach 100 million users. TikTok took nine months. ChatGPT took two. The place your customers ask questions changed faster than anything before it, and most businesses have never checked what it says about them. Two days live, 90 minutes a day, $7. Sep 23 and 24, 12:00 to 1:30 PM ET. Live only, no replay. Your rankings can be perfect and you can still be missing from the answer. Over two mornings we show you how the engines pick the two or three businesses they name, run your category live on the call, and hand you the framework we run for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. $7, one cohort a month.
Graphic text · destination · file
2.5 Years. 9 Months. 2 Months. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_21_Two_Months SH_Web_21_TwoMonths_ShockStat_30s / _60s

W22 · The six who will never tell you

Problem agitationShock stat

Reason to buy: the deck's sharpest line about the hidden nature of this shift. Your customers are using AI to decide and you will never see it in a survey or a support call.

30-second cut
0-5s

Six in ten American adults read AI search summaries. Most of them would never tell you they use AI.

Flat. Source line on screen: Pew Research Center, Americans and AI, June 2026.

5-23s

That's why this feels invisible. Nobody rings to say they picked your competitor because a machine named them. There's no line in your analytics for the customer who never arrived. It just quietly stops happening.

23-30s

Two days live, ninety minutes each, seven dollars. Twenty-third and twenty-fourth. Link below.

60-second cut
0-5s

Six in ten American adults read AI search summaries. Three in ten say they don't. And most of that six would never describe themselves as an AI user.

5-18s

That's Pew, this year. It's also why this change is so easy to miss from inside a business. Your customers aren't announcing it. They're just asking a machine first, getting three names, and calling one of them.

18-32s

There's no report for the customer who never arrived. No line in analytics, no lost-deal note, no bad review. The first time most owners find out is when a quarter comes in soft and nobody can say why.

Underplayed. Do not dramatise; the fact is enough.

32-46s

So over two mornings we make it visible. We run your category live, in the room, so you see what the machine currently says when someone asks who to use. Then the framework for changing it, the same one we run for QuickBooks and Weber.

46-53s

Seven dollars, ninety minutes a day, and the whole toolkit is yours to keep.

53-60s

September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, no replay, one cohort a month. Below.

Headlines
6 In 10 Read AI Summaries. Most Will Never Tell You. There Is No Report For The Customer Who Never Arrived Your Customers Are Not Announcing This
Primary text
Six in ten US adults read AI search summaries, and most of them would never describe themselves as AI users (Pew Research Center, 2026). That is why this is so easy to miss from inside a business: nobody calls to say they picked a competitor because a machine named them. Two days live, we run your category in the room and show you the framework for changing the answer. $7, Sep 23 and 24, live only. There is no line in your analytics for the customer who never arrived. The first time most owners notice is a soft quarter nobody can explain. Two mornings, 90 minutes each, $7, and you keep the whole toolkit. One cohort a month, no replay.
Graphic text · destination · file
6 In 10 Read AI Summaries. Most Will Never Tell You. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_22_Never_Tell_You SH_Web_22_NeverTell_ShockStat_30s / _60s

W23 · You did not lose a ranking

Problem agitationMyth-busting

Reason to buy: explains a drop the owner has already seen and could not account for. The best kind of ad: it names something they have already noticed.

30-second cut
0-5s

If your impressions held and your clicks fell, here's what happened. You didn't lose a ranking. You lost the click.

5-23s

When Google shows an AI Overview, people click a normal result about eight percent of the time. Without one, fifteen. That's Pew's behavioural study. Same position, half the traffic, and nothing in your rankings report changed to warn you.

On screen: 15% then 8%.

23-30s

Two days live on what to do about it. Seven dollars, twenty-third and twenty-fourth. Below.

Headlines
You Did Not Lose A Ranking. You Lost The Click. 15% Became 8%. Your Position Never Moved. The Report Is Green. The Channel Shrank.
Primary text
With an AI Overview on the page, people click a traditional search result about 8 percent of the time. Without one, 15 percent (Pew Research Center). Your position never moved; the page it sits on stopped being read. That is why a rankings report can look healthy while the channel shrinks. Two days live on what the engines actually reward, $7, Sep 23 and 24. If your impressions held and your clicks fell, this is what happened. Two mornings, 90 minutes each, your own category run live in the room, and the framework we use for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. $7, one cohort a month, no replay.
Graphic text · destination · file
You Did Not Lose A Ranking. You Lost The Click. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_23_Lost_The_Click SH_Web_23_LostTheClick_MythBust_30s / _60s
Day one · the mirror

The exercise, as five different ads.

The Mirror is the deck's strongest live moment: three prompts, six minutes, and everyone in the room finds out where they stand. It yields five distinct reasons to buy, because what people find is different every time. SOP-26's real-time contextual hook applies: a viewer who runs the prompt has just become the person this ad is for.

W24 · Three prompts, six minutes

TacticalCall-outDemo, phone

Reason to buy: the fastest audit anyone can run, done before the ad ends. Whatever they find is the reason to take the seat.

30-second cut
0-5s

Do this before the ad ends. Open ChatGPT and ask it three things about your own business.

Phone in hand, thumb typing, screen hidden.

5-23s

One: best whatever you sell, in your city, with citations. Two: who should I hire for the thing you do, and why them. Three: what do you know about your brand. Write one word for each. Named, missing, or wrong. Most businesses come back missing, and that's the whole reason for these two days.

23-30s

Bring your three answers. Seven dollars, twenty-third and twenty-fourth. Below.

Headlines
Three Prompts. Six Minutes. Then You Will Know. Named, Missing, Or Wrong? Run This Before You Decide Anything
Primary text
Open ChatGPT and ask three things: best [what you sell] in [your city] with citations; who should I hire for [what you do] and why them; what do you know about [your brand]. Write one word for each: named, missing, or wrong. Most businesses come back missing. Two days live on what to do about it, $7, Sep 23 and 24, 12:00 to 1:30 PM ET. Six minutes and a phone gets you the most useful piece of paper in your business this month. Then two mornings on changing what it says, using the framework we run for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh. $7, live only, one cohort a month.
Graphic text · destination · file
Open ChatGPT. Ask It Three Things About Your Business. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_24_Three_Prompts SH_Web_24_Mirror_Demo_30s / _60s

W25 · Recognition is not recall

CuriosityMyth-busting

Reason to buy: the distinction almost nobody has drawn for them. "It knows I exist" is the test everyone passes and the one that means nothing.

60-second cut
0-5s

Recognition is not recall, and the difference is worth more than any ranking you hold.

5-20s

Here's the test everyone runs: ask an AI what it knows about your company. It comes back with something reasonable and you feel fine. Almost everybody passes that. You've been online for years, of course there's something in there.

20-34s

Here's the test your buyer runs: best whatever you sell, for whoever they are, in their city. Nobody mentioned your name. The machine had to pick you out of your entire category and put you in a sentence. That's a completely different asset, and most well-run businesses do not own it.

34-48s

Over two mornings I'll show you how the engines decide which two or three businesses go in that sentence, we'll run your category live in the room, and you'll leave with the framework and the whole toolkit.

48-54s

Seven dollars, ninety minutes a day, and it's yours to keep.

54-60s

September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, no replay. Below.

Headlines
Recognition Is Not Recall "It Knows We Exist" Is The Test That Means Nothing Two Assets. Most Businesses Own One.
Primary text
Ask an AI what it knows about your company and it will tell you something. Everyone passes that test. The test your buyer runs is different: best [what you sell] in [their city], with nobody mentioning your name. The machine has to choose you out of your whole category. Those are two different assets and most businesses own only the first. Two days live, $7, Sep 23 and 24. Recognition is not recall. Over two mornings we show you how the engines pick the two or three businesses they name, run your category live in the room, and hand you the framework and the toolkit. $7, live only, no replay, one cohort a month.
Graphic text · destination · file
Recognition Is Not Recall. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_25_Recognition_Recall SH_Web_25_Recognition_MythBust_30s / _60s

W26 · There is no page two

Problem agitationBold claim

Reason to buy: the structural fact that makes this urgent rather than interesting. Classic search had ten winners and a consolation tail. This has one to three and no consolation prize.

30-second cut
0-5s

There is no page two of an AI answer.

Hold. Let it sit before the next line.

5-23s

Old search had ten winners on page one and a long tail of consolation traffic underneath. An AI answer names one to three businesses and stops. Nobody scrolls to find the one the machine left out. If you're not in the sentence, you weren't in the running, and you'll never see the search that decided it.

23-30s

Two days on getting into the sentence. Seven dollars, twenty-third and twenty-fourth. Below.

60-second cut
0-5s

Ten winners just became one to three. That's the whole change, and it happened without an announcement.

5-20s

Page one of Google had ten results, and even position eight got something. There was a consolation prize. An AI answer names one to three businesses in a sentence and then it's finished. There is no page two. Nobody scrolls to find the business the machine left out.

20-34s

And you'll never see it happen. There's no impression, no click, no line in a report. Somebody asked, three names came back, one of them got the call. If it wasn't you, nothing in your analytics will ever tell you.

Flat. This is the fear beat, so underplay it.

34-48s

Over two mornings we go through exactly how those one to three get chosen, run your own category live in the room so you can see where you sit, and hand you the framework we run for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.

48-54s

Seven dollars, ninety minutes a day, toolkit included.

54-60s

September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, one cohort a month. Below.

Headlines
There Is No Page Two Of An AI Answer Ten Winners Just Became One To Three No Consolation Prize
Primary text
Page one of Google had ten winners and a long tail underneath. An AI answer names one to three businesses and stops. There is no page two, and nobody scrolls to find the business the machine left out. You will never see the search that decided it. Two days live on getting into the sentence, $7, Sep 23 and 24. If you are not in the answer you were not in the running, and no report will tell you it happened. Two mornings, 90 minutes each, your category run live in the room, and the framework we use for QuickBooks and Weber. $7, live only, no replay.
Graphic text · destination · file
There Is No Page Two Of An AI Answer. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_26_No_Page_Two SH_Web_26_NoPageTwo_BoldClaim_30s / _60s

W27 · Your real competitor list

EnvyCuriosity

Reason to buy: the machine writes your competitive set from the same source material your buyers see, and it is rarely the list on the whiteboard. Envy, and it is factual.

30-second cut
0-5s

Ask an AI who to hire in your category and read the names it gives back. That's your real competitor list.

5-23s

Not the one on your whiteboard. The machine just wrote it, from the same source material your buyers are reading, and it's rarely who you think. Sometimes it's a business you've never heard of. Sometimes it's the one you stopped worrying about two years ago.

23-30s

Two days on taking that position back. Seven dollars, twenty-third and twenty-fourth. Below.

Headlines
A Machine Just Wrote Your Real Competitor List It Is Rarely The List On Your Whiteboard Who Is Standing Next To You In The Answer?
Primary text
Ask an AI who someone should hire for what you do. The two or three names it gives back are your real competitive set, built from the same source material your buyers see, and it is rarely the list on your whiteboard. Two days live on taking that position back. $7, Sep 23 and 24, 12:00 to 1:30 PM ET. First name mentioned and "you could also consider" are two different assets. We run the exercise live in the room, then work through exactly why the machine picks who it picks. $7, 90 minutes a day, toolkit included, one cohort a month, no replay.
Graphic text · destination · file
A Machine Just Wrote Your Real Competitor List. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_27_Real_Competitors SH_Web_27_RealCompetitors_Curiosity_30s / _60s

W28 · Named for the wrong thing

CuriositySpecific question

Reason to buy: the case nobody plans for. Being cited enthusiastically for the service you are trying to move away from is a positioning problem, and no amount of SEO fixes it.

60-second cut
0-5s

What if the AI does name you, and names you for completely the wrong thing?

5-20s

It happens more than the missing case, and it's worse, because it looks like a win. You're in the answer. You're just in it as the budget option, or for the service line you've been trying to shut down for two years, or with a description of your business that stopped being true in 2022.

20-34s

That is a positioning problem wearing a visibility problem's clothes. No amount of technical SEO fixes it, because the machine isn't reading your intentions. It's reading what everybody else has published about you, and that's a different job with a different method.

34-48s

Over two mornings we go through how an answer about your brand actually gets assembled, why it gets things wrong, and the specific work that changes it. Then you run it on your own business in the room.

48-54s

Seven dollars, ninety minutes a day, and you keep the toolkit.

54-60s

September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, one cohort a month. Below.

Headlines
What If AI Names You For The Wrong Thing? Still Introduced As The Cheap Option Being In The Answer Is Not Always A Win
Primary text
There is a failure mode worse than being missing: being named for the thing you do not want to sell. You spent three years moving upmarket and the machine still introduces you as the budget option. That is a positioning problem wearing a visibility problem's clothes, and no amount of technical SEO touches it. Two days live on the work that does. $7, Sep 23 and 24. AI is not reading your intentions. It is reading what everyone else has published about you. Over two mornings we go through how an answer about your brand gets assembled, why it gets things wrong, and what changes it. $7, live only, no replay.
Graphic text · destination · file
What If AI Names You For The Wrong Thing? https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_28_Wrong_Thing SH_Web_28_WrongThing_Question_30s / _60s
Day one · the rent ledger

Two ads on the cost of the fallback channel.

Both numbers here are on the slide with their sources, which settles the open question from the topic test: cost per lead is up 72 percent between 2022 and 2025, $40.74 to $70.11 (WordStream, Google Ads Benchmarks), and paid clicks are down 68 percent where an AI Overview appears (Seer Interactive, AIO Impact on Google CTR, September 2025). Use these, not the unsourced 57 percent that circulated earlier.

W29 · Same landlord

Problem agitationPain

Reason to buy: the lease is getting worse from both ends at once, and the owner feels one end already. Naming the second end is the insight.

30-second cut
0-5s

Your cost per lead is up seventy-two percent since 2022. And on the same searches, paid clicks are down sixty-eight percent.

Two figures on screen. Sources in small type: WordStream, Seer Interactive.

5-23s

Forty dollars seventy-four to seventy dollars eleven, on average. The rent went up and the street got quieter, and it's the same landlord doing both. That's not an argument for turning ads off. It's an argument for stopping treating one rented channel as the whole portfolio.

23-30s

Two days on building the one you own. Seven dollars, twenty-third and twenty-fourth. Below.

60-second cut
0-5s

The rent went up. The street got quieter. Same landlord.

5-20s

Average cost per lead on Google Ads climbed seventy-two percent between 2022 and 2025, forty dollars seventy-four to seventy dollars eleven. Over the same period, paid clicks fell sixty-eight percent on searches where an AI Overview shows up. Both ends of the lease got worse at once.

Sources on screen throughout this beat.

20-34s

When organic slides, most businesses fall back on paid, because it's fast and measurable. But you don't own that traffic, you rent it. It works the day you pay and stops the day you stop, and someone else sets the price.

34-48s

Over two mornings you'll do a ninety-second exercise on your own numbers, work out what your annual rent actually is, and then spend the rest of the time on the channel nobody can price you out of. Framework and toolkit included.

48-54s

I'm not telling you to turn the ads off. I'm telling you not to run one rented channel as the whole portfolio.

54-60s

Seven dollars. September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, no replay. Below.

Headlines
The Rent Went Up. The Street Got Quieter. +72% Cost Per Lead. -68% Paid Clicks. $40.74 To $70.11. Same Landlord.
Primary text
Average cost per lead on Google Ads climbed 72 percent between 2022 and 2025, from $40.74 to $70.11 (WordStream). Over the same period paid clicks fell 68 percent on searches where an AI Overview appears (Seer Interactive, 2025). The rent went up, the street got quieter, and it is the same landlord doing both. Two days live on the channel nobody can price you out of. $7, Sep 23 and 24. This is not an argument for turning your ads off. It is an argument for not treating one rented channel as the whole portfolio. Ninety seconds on your own numbers, then two mornings on building the one you own. $7, live only, no replay, one cohort a month.
Graphic text · destination · file
The Rent Went Up. The Street Got Quieter. Same Landlord. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_29_Same_Landlord SH_Web_29_SameLandlord_Pain_30s / _60s

W30 · Rented, borrowed, owned

TacticalYou already knowWhiteboard

Reason to buy: a sorting frame they can apply to their whole marketing budget in sixty seconds, which is a genuinely useful thing to receive from an ad.

60-second cut
0-5s

Here's a sixty-second exercise that will tell you more about your marketing than most quarterly reviews.

5-20s

Three columns. Rented: paid search, paid social. It works the day you pay and it stops the day you stop, and the price is set by someone else. It's gone up seventy-two percent since 2022.

20-32s

Borrowed: marketplaces, platforms, somebody else's audience. Real customers and real revenue, with a landlord who can change the terms on a Tuesday. Owned: your site, your list, and your brand travelling on its own. Slowest to build. The only one nobody can price you out of.

32-46s

Now put your actual numbers against the three. For most businesses it's almost all rented, a bit borrowed, and a column three that hasn't been touched in years, which was survivable when search still sent traffic and is a different proposition now.

46-54s

Two mornings on building column three, with the framework we run for QuickBooks and Weber and the toolkit to keep going after.

54-60s

Seven dollars, September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, no replay.

Headlines
Rented, Borrowed, Owned. Sort Your Budget. The Only Channel Nobody Can Price You Out Of Sixty Seconds, Three Columns
Primary text
Sort every channel you spend on into three buckets. Rented: paid search and paid social, works while you pay, price set by someone else, up 72 percent since 2022. Borrowed: marketplaces and platforms, real revenue, a landlord who can change the terms on a Tuesday. Owned: your site, your list, your brand travelling on its own. Two days live on building the third one. $7, Sep 23 and 24. For most businesses it is almost all rented, a bit borrowed, and a column three nobody has touched in years. That was survivable when search still sent traffic. Two mornings, 90 minutes each, framework and toolkit included. $7, live only, one cohort a month.
Graphic text · destination · file
Rented. Borrowed. Owned. Which Is Most Of Your Budget? https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_30_Rented_Borrowed_Owned SH_Web_30_RentedBorrowedOwned_Demo_30s / _60s
Day one · ranking is not citation, and the citation map

Four ads that correct a belief.

The deck's spine: AI search is built on top of SEO, not instead of it, but being number one and being named are different competitions. These four are the myth-busting cluster, and they are the ones most likely to stop a marketing lead mid-scroll because they contradict something they said in a meeting last week.

W31 · Two different competitions

Myth-bustingBold claim

Reason to buy: resolves the question every owner has quietly: does my existing SEO still count? Yes, as the foundation, and no, not as the finish line.

60-second cut
0-5s

If someone tells you SEO is dead, they haven't looked at the data. Here's what it actually says.

5-20s

Ninety percent of Google's AI Overviews cite at least one page from the organic top ten. More than half cite the number one result itself. Ninety-seven percent cite something in the top twenty. That's a 432,000 keyword study by seoClarity. AI search is built on top of SEO, not instead of it.

20-34s

Which is exactly where businesses get caught. Ranking is the entry fee. It gets you into the pool the machine draws from. It does not decide which one to three names go in the sentence, and that second decision runs on different signals that most agencies have never had to work with.

34-48s

Over two mornings we go through those signals one at a time, six of them, and you'll run your own site against each. The framework we use for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh, and it's the one Samsung found us through.

48-54s

Seven dollars, ninety minutes a day, toolkit yours to keep.

54-60s

September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, no replay. Below.

Headlines
Being Number One And Being Named Are Different Competitions 90% Of AI Overviews Cite The Organic Top 10 Ranking Is The Entry Fee, Not The Result
Primary text
90 percent of Google's AI Overviews cite at least one page from the organic top ten, and more than half cite the number one result itself (seoClarity, 432,000 keywords). AI search is built on top of SEO, not instead of it. But ranking is the entry fee: it gets you into the pool, it does not decide which one to three names go in the sentence. Two days live on the second competition. $7, Sep 23 and 24. Your existing SEO still counts. It just is not the finish line any more. Two mornings on the six signals that decide who gets named, run against your own site in the room. $7, live only, no replay, toolkit included.
Graphic text · destination · file
Being Number One And Being Named Are Two Different Competitions. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_31_Two_Competitions SH_Web_31_TwoCompetitions_BoldClaim_30s / _60s

W32 · You were sold exercises

FrustrationAnalogy

Reason to buy: the best line in the deck. It reframes years of disappointing SEO spend without blaming the buyer or calling anyone a fraud, and it makes sequence the product.

30-second cut
0-5s

Two people join the same gym. Same equipment, same fees, same twelve months. One changes shape, one doesn't.

5-23s

Nobody concludes gyms are a scam. The difference was the programme. Same with your SEO. A blog post here, some links there, a technical fix in March: every one of those is a real exercise a good trainer might prescribe. Done in no particular order, they're great exercises for the wrong person.

23-30s

Two days on the programme, in order. Seven dollars, twenty-third and twenty-fourth.

60-second cut
0-5s

"Does SEO actually work?" is a question that has never had a useful answer. Here's the one that does.

5-20s

Two people join the same gym on the same day. Same equipment, same fees, same twelve months. One changes shape and one doesn't. Nobody concludes gyms are a scam, and nobody concludes gyms are magic. The difference was the programme.

20-34s

You've been sold exercises. A blog post here, some links there, a technical fix in March. Every one is a real exercise a good trainer might prescribe. Done in no particular order, for the wrong individual, they produce exactly what you've experienced.

34-48s

So the question isn't does SEO work. It's whether anyone was ever running a programme, or whether you were being handed exercises and invoiced. You already know which one you've been buying.

This is the line. Say it plainly and stop.

48-54s

Two mornings on the programme, in the order it goes in, for AI search and search together. Seven dollars, and the toolkit's yours.

54-60s

September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, one cohort a month. Below.

Headlines
You Were Sold Exercises, Not A Programme Two People Join The Same Gym Sequence Beats Effort
Primary text
Two people join the same gym. Same equipment, same fees, same twelve months. One changes shape, one does not. Nobody concludes gyms are a scam. The difference was the programme. A blog post here, some links there, a technical fix in March: every one is a real exercise, done in no particular order, for the wrong individual. Two days live on the programme, in order. $7, Sep 23 and 24. The question is not "does SEO work". It is whether anyone was ever running a programme, or whether you were handed exercises and invoiced. Two mornings, 90 minutes each, the framework in the order it goes in. $7, live only, no replay.
Graphic text · destination · file
You Were Sold Exercises. Nobody Ran A Programme. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_32_Sold_Exercises SH_Web_32_SoldExercises_Analogy_30s / _60s

Highest-potential ad in the bank. It validates a real grievance without accusing the current supplier, which is what lets a business owner forward it to their own marketing manager. Film it three times until the gym story sounds told rather than performed.

W33 · Sourced, considered, invisible

CuriositySpecific question

Reason to buy: gives them a category to place themselves in, and the middle one is deliberately uncomfortable because it is where the competent businesses sit.

60-second cut
0-5s

There are three places your business can be in an AI answer, and only one of them pays.

5-20s

Sourced: you're named inside the answer. One to three businesses per question, that's the whole prize. Samsung found us that way. No ad, no referral, nobody in the room who knew us.

20-34s

Considered: you rank, you're crawlable, the machine knows precisely who you are, and it named somebody else. That's where most professional, well-run businesses are sitting right now, and it's the worst place to be, because from the inside everything looks healthy.

34-44s

Invisible: not in the conversation at all. The answer gets written as though your business doesn't exist, and you will never see the search that decided it.

44-54s

Over two mornings you'll find out which one you are, in the room, and then work through what it takes to move up. Framework and toolkit included, seven dollars.

54-60s

September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, no replay. Below.

Headlines
Sourced, Considered, Or Invisible? The Machine Knows Exactly Who You Are. It Named Someone Else. Three Places To Be. One Of Them Pays.
Primary text
Three places your business can be in an AI answer. Sourced: named inside it, one to three per question. Considered: you rank, you are crawlable, the machine knows exactly who you are, and it named somebody else. Invisible: not in the conversation at all. Most professional, well-run businesses are the middle one, and from the inside everything looks healthy. Two days live on moving up. $7, Sep 23 and 24. Classic search had ten winners and a consolation tail. AI search has one to three and no consolation prize. Find out which you are, in the room, then work through what it takes to change it. $7, 90 minutes a day, live only, no replay.
Graphic text · destination · file
Sourced, Considered, Or Invisible? https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_33_Citation_Map SH_Web_33_CitationMap_Question_30s / _60s

W34 · Decided before you are in the room

UrgencyShock stat

Reason to buy: converts an AI-search argument into a pipeline argument, which is the version a B2B owner or a sales-led business actually acts on.

30-second cut
0-5s

Sixty percent of a B2B buying journey is done before a seller is ever contacted. Eighty percent of the time, the first vendor contacted wins.

5-23s

And ninety-five percent of winners were on the shortlist from day one. That's 6sense, about four thousand buyers. Which means the shortlist is the sale, and it now gets written by a machine, in an answer you never see, before anyone has heard of you.

Three figures on screen in sequence.

23-30s

Two days on getting onto that shortlist. Seven dollars, twenty-third and twenty-fourth.

60-second cut
0-5s

This isn't a marketing number. It's a pipeline number, and it's the reason AI search matters to your revenue this quarter.

5-20s

Sixty percent of the B2B buying journey is complete before a seller is contacted. Eighty percent of the time, the first vendor contacted wins the deal. And ninety-five percent of winners came off the day-one shortlist. That's 6sense, roughly four thousand buyers.

20-34s

Put those together and the shortlist is the sale. Everything after it is paperwork. So the only question that matters is how that shortlist gets built, and increasingly the answer is: a machine writes it, in a conversation you're not part of, from sources you didn't know it was reading.

34-48s

Over two mornings we go through exactly how it's assembled, run your own category live in the room so you can see whether you're on it, and hand you the framework we run for QuickBooks, Weber and HelloFresh.

48-54s

Of your last ten deals, how many arrived already knowing who you were? That's the number this is about.

54-60s

Seven dollars. September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, no replay.

Headlines
The Sale Is Decided Before You Are In The Room 95% Of Winners Came Off The Day-One Shortlist The Shortlist Is The Sale
Primary text
60 percent of the B2B buying journey is done before a seller is contacted. 80 percent of the time the first vendor contacted wins. 95 percent of winners came off the day-one shortlist (6sense, ~4,000 buyers). The shortlist is the sale, and it now gets written by a machine in a conversation you are not part of. Two days live on getting onto it. $7, Sep 23 and 24. Of your last ten deals, how many arrived already knowing who you were? Two mornings on how the shortlist is assembled, your own category run live in the room, and the framework we use for QuickBooks and Weber. $7, live only, no replay.
Graphic text · destination · file
95% Of Winners Came Off The Day-One Shortlist. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_34_Shortlist_Is_Sale SH_Web_34_Shortlist_ShockStat_30s / _60s
Day one · what you are being sold

Two ads that save them money, which is why they get watched.

W35 · The three companies telling you not to give up

Social proofObjection-first

Reason to buy: answers "is SEO dead, should I stop?" with the least self-interested proof available: the platforms that would benefit most from you quitting are telling you not to.

60-second cut
0-5s

You've probably been told SEO is dead. Look at who would gain most from you believing that.

5-20s

If businesses stopped investing in organic search tomorrow, three companies would do very well out of it. And all three are on the record telling you not to. Shopify is publicly telling merchants to keep investing. Microsoft says traditional SEO fundamentals matter more than ever. Google says best practices continue to be relevant because it's all built off the search index.

20-34s

That's about as disinterested as evidence gets. The traffic didn't vanish, it changed shape, and the businesses reading "SEO is dead" as permission to stop are handing their category to whoever kept going.

34-48s

Over two mornings we go through the new shape: how the engines choose which one to three businesses to name, the six signals that decide it, and your own site run against each one, live in the room.

48-54s

Seven dollars, ninety minutes a day, and the toolkit is yours to keep.

54-60s

September twenty-third and twenty-fourth, twelve to one-thirty Eastern. Live only, one cohort a month. Below.

Headlines
The Three Companies With The Most To Gain From You Giving Up All Three Are Telling You Not To The Traffic Did Not Vanish. It Changed Shape.
Primary text
If businesses stopped investing in organic search tomorrow, three companies would do very well out of it. All three are on the record telling you not to. Shopify is publicly telling merchants to keep investing in SEO. Microsoft says traditional SEO fundamentals matter more than ever. Google says best practices continue to be relevant because it is all built off the search index. Two days live on the new shape. $7, Sep 23 and 24. The traffic did not vanish, it changed shape. Businesses reading "SEO is dead" as permission to stop are handing their category to whoever kept going. Two mornings on the six signals that decide who gets named. $7, live only, no replay.
Graphic text · destination · file
The 3 Companies With Most To Gain From You Giving Up Say Don't. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_35_Three_Companies SH_Web_35_ThreeCompanies_ObjFirst_30s / _60s

W36 · Money you do not need to spend

TacticalObjection-first

Reason to buy: the ad that saves them money before they have bought anything. It also positions Harry against the people currently pitching them, without naming anyone.

30-second cut
0-5s

Four things are being sold to you right now for AI search, and you don't need to buy any of them.

5-23s

One: getting you listed in ChatGPT. There is no listing. If a pitch promises you a slot, ask them to show you the slot. Two: an llms.txt file. No major assistant has committed to reading it. Three: chopping your site into FAQ blocks. Four: buying the AI visibility dashboard first. A tool that tells you weekly that you're not cited is not the same as being worth citing.

23-30s

Two days on what actually works. Seven dollars, twenty-third and twenty-fourth.

Headlines
Four Things Being Sold To You That You Do Not Need There Is No Listing To Buy In ChatGPT Ask Them To Show You The Slot
Primary text
Four things being sold for AI search right now that you do not need to buy. "We will get you listed in ChatGPT": there is no listing, ask them to show you the slot. "llms.txt is the fix": no major assistant has committed to reading it. "Rewrite the site into FAQ blocks": forty more pages saying the same nothing. "Buy the visibility tool first": a dashboard telling you weekly that you are not cited is not the same as being worth citing. Two days live on what actually works. $7, Sep 23 and 24. Measure after you have built something to measure, not before. Two mornings on the six signals the engines use, run against your own site in the room, toolkit included. $7, live only, one cohort a month.
Graphic text · destination · file
4 Things Being Sold To You Right Now That You Do Not Need. https://webinar.studiohawk.com/?a=WEB_36_Money_Not_To_Spend SH_Web_36_MoneyNotSpend_ObjFirst_30s / _60s
Four more reasons, briefed not scripted

Next month's batch.

SOP-26 wants a refresh every two to four weeks and these are the reserve. Each has its hook, its body argument and its slide; write the beats when the first sixteen have run.

#HookBody argumentTag
W37"Three questions to ask whoever you're currently paying, this week."Show me a page on my site the way an AI crawler receives it. Which third-party pages get cited in my category, and what's our plan for them. What did we get named in last month that we weren't named in before. Give the good answer and the bad answer for each, exactly as the deck does. Ends: a good agency will welcome these questions, and you'll know inside a week. Slide 41.WEB_37_Three_Questions
W38"Stop publishing more. There is no page eleven."The reflex when traffic drops is volume. But there's no page eleven now, and twice as many pages saying the same thing is twice as much of nothing. The work that moves an AI answer is not more content, it is content that could only have come from you. Slide 41 plus chapter 8 of the book. Good pairing with W36 as a "stop wasting money" cluster. Slide 41.WEB_38_No_Page_Eleven
W39"Why am I doing a seven dollar event at all? I'll answer it before you have to ask."Three reasons, verbatim from the deck: we want strategy calls and a handful of people in the room will be a good fit; this shift is mispriced right now and businesses that move in the next twelve months get a position that businesses moving in three years won't; an educated buyer is a better client. "That is the whole motive. There is nothing behind it." The objection-first ad for the price-suspicious. Slide 16.WEB_39_Why_Doing_This
W40"You asked one question. The machine asked twelve."Query fan-out: your buyer types one question and the engine silently expands it into a dozen sub-questions, retrieves for each, and assembles one answer. So you are not competing for one query any more, you are competing for the dozen behind it, and you cannot see any of them. Credit Aleyda Solis for the term on the slide. Slide 34.WEB_40_Query_Fan_Out
How to run it

Same rules as the call bank, three differences.

SettingFor the webinar
ObjectiveConversions on the registration event, not on a tap-fireable one. SOP-04's pixel-conditioning rule matters less here because the $7 payment is itself the qualifier: optimise to the purchase, not the page view.
PlacementsManual. Audience Network excluded. This is the rule that round one of the topic test broke, and it cost roughly $1,100.
AudienceA real one: interests, a lookalike from the client list or past registrants, retargeting. Exclude anyone already registered for this cohort.
Dynamic creativePer ad set: 2 to 4 videos, the 3 headlines and 2 primary texts above, plus one static of the graphic text on a plain card. One reason per ad set.
CadenceCohort-shaped rather than evergreen. Push hardest in the ten days before the date, and let the date do the urgency. The monthly refresh is largely a date change plus swapping in two reserve reasons.
BenchmarkSOP-04: aim for a 30 to 50 percent opt-in rate on the registration page. Below that, the page is the problem, not the ad. Watch cost per registration as the primary metric, with CTR and frequency as the diagnostics.
RetargetingRegistered but not attended is the Hammer Them audience for this funnel, and the window is short. The library applies with the CTA swapped for "see you on the twenty-third".
Every statistic in these sixteen ads is on a slide in the deck with its source printed beside it. UBS via Reuters for the two months. Pew Research Center for six in ten and for the 8 versus 15 percent click behaviour. WordStream for the 72 percent and the $40.74 to $70.11. Seer Interactive, September 2025, for the 68 percent. seoClarity's 432,000-keyword study for 90, 50 and 97 percent. 6sense, about 4,000 buyers, for 60, 80 and 95. Shopify, Microsoft and Google are quoted from their own public statements. Nothing here is new, unsourced or rounded in our favour, and the unsourced 57 percent that circulated on the topic-test page is not used anywhere.